TSTP Solution File: SEV416^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV416^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:54:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 3 ~; 1 |; 1 &; 8 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 ^ 4 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cG: $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
cB: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cA: $i > $o ).
thf(cDUAL_EG3_pme,conjecture,
( ( ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ( cB @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ( cB @ X1 ) ) )
=> cG )
| ( ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ( cB @ X1 ) )
=> cG ) )
=> ( ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ( cB @ X1 ) )
=> cG ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MU29Fv3yla/E---3.1_30254.p',cDUAL_EG3_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cDUAL_EG3_pme])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.15 % Problem : SEV416^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 19:38:09 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.52 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MU29Fv3yla/E---3.1_30254.p
% 0.24/0.53 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.24/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # sh4l with pid 30335 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Result found by sh4l
% 0.24/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.53 # Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # new_ho_10 with pid 30340 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.24/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.53 # Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.53
% 0.24/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.24/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.24/0.53 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 1
% 0.24/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 145
% 0.24/0.53 # Search garbage collected termcells : 37
% 0.24/0.53
% 0.24/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.53 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.53 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.24/0.53 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.24/0.53
% 0.24/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.53 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.53 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.24/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.40/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------