TSTP Solution File: SEV411^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV411^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:13:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEV411^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:28:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (25513)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25517)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25514)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25515)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25516)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25512)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25517)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (25518)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (25513)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, cB: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, cA: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 $false),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f16,f20])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ~spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f19])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 $false | ~spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f12])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ((cA @ sK0) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 (((cA @ sK0) = $true) & ((cB @ sK0) != $true)) & (! [X1] : (((cA @ X1) != $true) | ((cB @ X1) = $true)) | ! [X2] : (((cA @ X2) != $true) | ((cB @ X2) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f7,f8])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ? [X0] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) & ((cB @ X0) != $true)) => (((cA @ sK0) = $true) & ((cB @ sK0) != $true))),
% 0.13/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ? [X0] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) & ((cB @ X0) != $true)) & (! [X1] : (((cA @ X1) != $true) | ((cB @ X1) = $true)) | ! [X2] : (((cA @ X2) != $true) | ((cB @ X2) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ? [X2] : (((cA @ X2) = $true) & ((cB @ X2) != $true)) & (! [X1] : (((cA @ X1) != $true) | ((cB @ X1) = $true)) | ! [X0] : (((cA @ X0) != $true) | ((cB @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ~((! [X0] : (((cA @ X0) = $true) => ((cB @ X0) = $true)) | ! [X1] : (((cA @ X1) = $true) => ((cB @ X1) = $true))) => ! [X2] : (((cA @ X2) = $true) => ((cB @ X2) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ~((! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0)) | ! [X1] : ((cA @ X1) => (cB @ X1))) => ! [X2] : ((cA @ X2) => (cB @ X2)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.38 ~((! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0)) | ! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0))) => ! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0)))),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.38 (! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0)) | ! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0))) => ! [X0] : ((cA @ X0) => (cB @ X0))),
% 0.13/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cDUAL_EG1_pme)).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ((cA @ sK0) != $true) | ~spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f17])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ($true != $true) | ((cA @ sK0) != $true) | ~spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f11,f15])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (((cB @ X2) = $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true)) ) | ~spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f14])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 spl1_1 <=> ! [X2] : (((cB @ X2) = $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true))),
% 0.13/0.38 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ((cB @ sK0) != $true)),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 spl1_1 | spl1_1),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f14,f14])).
% 0.13/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.13/0.38 ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cA @ X1) != $true) | ((cB @ X2) = $true) | ((cB @ X1) = $true) | ((cA @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 0.13/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (25517)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38 % (25511)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------