TSTP Solution File: SEV387^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEV387^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:13:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   99 (  12 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  933 ( 222 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1172 ( 166   ~; 204   |; 264   &; 531   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  21   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  20   ^  12   !;   6   ?;  39   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK5: a ).

thf(f358,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f294,f303,f320,f333,f339,f346,f349,f357]) ).

thf(f357,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f356]) ).

thf(f356,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f352]) ).

thf(f352,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f271,f267]) ).

thf(f267,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f265]) ).

thf(f265,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

thf(f271,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f269]) ).

thf(f269,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

thf(f349,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f348]) ).

thf(f348,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f347]) ).

thf(f347,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_5
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f291,f284]) ).

thf(f284,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f282]) ).

thf(f282,plain,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])]) ).

thf(f291,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f289]) ).

thf(f289,plain,
    ( spl3_6
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_6])]) ).

thf(f346,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f345]) ).

thf(f345,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f342]) ).

thf(f342,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f275,f279]) ).

thf(f279,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f277]) ).

thf(f277,plain,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])]) ).

thf(f275,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f273]) ).

thf(f273,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

thf(f339,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | spl3_6
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f31,f269,f289,f273]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
   != ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      @ sK5 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK5 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
              & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
            & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ( X2 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                  & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
              & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 )
              & ( ( ~ ( X0 @ X3 )
                  & ( X1 @ X3 ) )
                | ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                    & ( X2 @ X4 ) )
                & ( X2 @ X4 )
                & ( X1 @ X4 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                    & ( X2 @ X4 ) )
                & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              & ( ( ~ ( X2 @ X3 )
                  & ( X1 @ X3 ) )
                | ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                    & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
                & ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ( X1 @ X4 ) )
              | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                    & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
                & ( X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            & ( ( ~ ( X2 @ X3 )
                & ( X1 @ X3 ) )
              | ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                  & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
              & ( X0 @ X4 )
              & ( X1 @ X4 ) )
            | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
              & ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                  & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
              & ( X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cGAZING_THM44_pme) ).

thf(f333,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_5
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f63,f277,f282,f269]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f59]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f320,plain,
    ( spl3_6
    | spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f132,f277,f289]) ).

thf(f132,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f131]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f129]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f128]) ).

thf(f128,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f126]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f303,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | spl3_2
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f210,f282,f269,f273]) ).

thf(f210,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f209]) ).

thf(f209,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f208]) ).

thf(f208,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f207]) ).

thf(f207,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f206]) ).

thf(f206,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f205]) ).

thf(f205,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f195]) ).

thf(f195,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f194]) ).

thf(f194,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f193]) ).

thf(f193,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f174]) ).

thf(f174,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f146]) ).

thf(f146,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f145]) ).

thf(f145,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f294,plain,
    spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f248,f265]) ).

thf(f248,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
    = $true ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f247]) ).

thf(f247,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f245]) ).

thf(f245,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f238]) ).

thf(f238,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f237]) ).

thf(f237,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f235]) ).

thf(f235,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f233]) ).

thf(f233,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SEV387^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:46:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.20/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38  % (18814)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18815)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18811)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18809)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18812)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18810)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18813)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18816)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (18814)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.39  % (18809)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.39  % (18811)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39  % (18814)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39  % (18808)Success in time 0.02 s
% 0.20/0.39  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------