TSTP Solution File: SEV345^5 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SEV345^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n124.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:57:04 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 22.95s
% Output : FiniteModel 22.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV345^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n124.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:19:49 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 22.95/9.74 Nitpicking formula...
% 22.95/9.74 Timestamp: 00:19:57
% 22.95/9.74 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 22.95/9.74 able to skip some scopes
% 22.95/9.74 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 22.95/9.74 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 22.95/9.74 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 22.95/9.74 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 22.95/9.74 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 22.95/9.74 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 22.95/9.74 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 22.95/9.74 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 22.95/9.74 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 22.95/9.74 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1:
% 22.95/9.74
% 22.95/9.74 Constants:
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_cGVB_DOMAIN = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_cGVB_FUNCTION = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_cGVB_MAPS =
% 22.95/9.74 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 22.95/9.74 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)))
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_cGVB_RANGE = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_cGVB_SUBSET = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False))
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_f = i1
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_x = i1
% 22.95/9.74 bnd_y = i1
% 22.95/9.74 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 22.95/9.74 Total time: 520 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------