%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SEV331^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n114.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:57:01 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 23.35s
% Output   : FiniteModel 23.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV331^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n114.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:19:03 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 23.35/15.77  Nitpicking formula...
% 23.35/15.77  Timestamp: 00:19:12
% 23.35/15.77  The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 23.35/15.77  able to skip some scopes
% 23.35/15.77  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 23.35/15.77  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 23.35/15.77  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 23.35/15.77    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 23.35/15.77    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 23.35/15.77    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 23.35/15.77    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 23.35/15.77    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 23.35/15.77  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 23.35/15.77  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 23.35/15.77  
% 23.35/15.77    Constants:
% 23.35/15.77      bnd_cGVB_NOP =
% 23.35/15.77        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 23.35/15.77        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 23.35/15.77         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1))
% 23.35/15.77      bnd_cGVB_OP =
% 23.35/15.77        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 23.35/15.77        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 23.35/15.77         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1))
% 23.35/15.77      bnd_cGVB_SING = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)
% 23.35/15.77      bnd_x = i2
% 23.35/15.77      bnd_y = i1
% 23.35/15.77  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 23.35/15.77  Total time: 3.8 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------