TSTP Solution File: SEV300^5 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SEV300^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:54:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   31
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  170 (  89 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  351 (  65   ~;  98   |;  18   &; 164   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (  13   ^  55   !;  12   ?;  80   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    cONE: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    cSUCC: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    cZERO: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk1_2: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk2_1: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk3_1: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

thf(cZERO_def,axiom,
    ( cZERO
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $o] :
          ~ ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cwp2yegyMu/E---3.1_25509.p',cZERO_def) ).

thf(cSUCC_def,axiom,
    ( cSUCC
    = ( ^ [X3: ( $i > $o ) > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
        ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          & ( X3
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( ( X4 != X2 )
                & ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cwp2yegyMu/E---3.1_25509.p',cSUCC_def) ).

thf(cONE_def,axiom,
    ( cONE
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X13: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X13 )
          & ~ ? [X12: $i] :
                ( ( X12 != X13 )
                & ( Z0 @ X12 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cwp2yegyMu/E---3.1_25509.p',cONE_def) ).

thf(cX6101_EXT_pme,conjecture,
    ( ! [X5: $i > $i,X6: $i > $i] :
        ( ! [X2: $i] :
            ( ( X5 @ X2 )
            = ( X6 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X5 = X6 ) )
   => ( cONE
      = ( ^ [X7: $i > $o] :
          ? [X8: $i] :
            ( X7
            = ( ^ [X2: $i,X8: $i] : ( X2 = X8 )
              @ X8 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cwp2yegyMu/E---3.1_25509.p',cX6101_EXT_pme) ).

thf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( cZERO
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ~ ? [X2: $i] : ( Z0 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cZERO_def]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( cSUCC
    = ( ^ [Z0: ( $i > $o ) > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ? [X2: $i] :
          ( ( Z1 @ X2 )
          & ( Z0
            @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                ( ( Z2 != X2 )
                & ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cSUCC_def]) ).

thf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( cONE
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ? [X13: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X13 )
          & ~ ? [X12: $i] :
                ( ( X12 != X13 )
                & ( Z0 @ X12 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[cONE_def,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X5: $i > $i,X6: $i > $i] :
          ( ! [X2: $i] :
              ( ( X5 @ X2 )
              = ( X6 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X5 = X6 ) )
     => ! [X16: $i > $o] :
          ( ? [X14: $i] :
              ( ( X16 @ X14 )
              & ~ ? [X15: $i] :
                    ( ( X15 != X14 )
                    & ( X16 @ X15 ) ) )
        <=> ? [X8: $i] :
            ! [X17: $i] :
              ( ( X16 @ X17 )
            <=> ( X8 = X17 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cX6101_EXT_pme])]),c_0_6])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X18: $i > $i,X19: $i > $i,X22: $i,X24: $i,X27: $i,X29: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( X18 @ ( esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19 ) )
         != ( X19 @ ( esk1_2 @ X18 @ X19 ) ) )
        | ( X18 = X19 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( X24
         != ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( ( esk2_1 @ X22 )
         != X22 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X22 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( X24
          = ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( ( esk2_1 @ X22 )
         != X22 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X22 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( X24
         != ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X22 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X22 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( X24
          = ( esk3_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X22 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X22 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X29 )
        | ( esk5_0 = X29 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 != X29 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ X29 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X29 )
        | ( esk5_0 = X29 )
        | ( X27 = esk4_0 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X27 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 != X29 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ X29 )
        | ( X27 = esk4_0 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X27 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ X2 )
      | ( X4 = esk4_0 )
      | ( esk5_0 != X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = esk4_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X2
        = ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ X2 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
      | ( esk5_0 != X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X2
        = ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk4_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = X4 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ X2 )
        = X2 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])])]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ X2 )
        = esk4_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X2 )
        = X2 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X2
       != ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk4_0 )
      = esk4_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X2
       != ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X4 )
       != X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
       != X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk4_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( esk5_0 = X2 )
      | ( X4 = esk4_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk5_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ( esk5_0 = X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = X4 )
      | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = X4 )
      | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X2 )
        = X2 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_29])]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
      = esk5_0 )
    | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_30])]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_31]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
       != X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_31]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( esk4_0 = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_35])]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = X4 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X4 )
        = X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk3_1 @ X2 )
        = X2 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ ( esk3_1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_39])]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_1 @ esk5_0 )
    = esk5_0 ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_40])]) ).

thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_41]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
       != X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_41]),c_0_25])]) ).

thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_1 @ X2 )
        = esk5_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_42]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44])]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEV300^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 19:05:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Cwp2yegyMu/E---3.1_25509.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh3l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 25587 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 429s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 268s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 268s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_2 with 268s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_9 with 267s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # sh5l with pid 25594 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMSNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(2): HGHSF-FFSF21-SHHFMMBN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 429s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 268s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 81
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 60
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 58
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 23
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 364
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 240
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 290
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 60
% 0.19/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 119
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 116
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 119
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 749
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 327
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 182
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 42
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 81
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 19250
% 0.19/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 398
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1868 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.079 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.088 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------