TSTP Solution File: SEV290^5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SEV290^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:24:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.55s 3.74s
% Output : Proof 3.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SEV290^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 01:53:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.55/3.74 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun A => ∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), A Xx → c_less__eq_ Xx c0)) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Exists fun A => ∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), A Xx → c_less__eq_ Xx c0) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop), Eq (∀ (Xx : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), a Xx → c_less__eq_ Xx c0) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : (Iota → Prop) → Prop),
% 3.55/3.74 Eq (Not (a (skS.0 0 a a_1) → c_less__eq_ (skS.0 0 a a_1) c0)) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : (Iota → Prop) → Prop),
% 3.55/3.74 Eq (a (skS.0 0 a a_1) → c_less__eq_ (skS.0 0 a a_1) c0) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : ((Iota → Prop) → Prop) → Prop) (a_1 : (Iota → Prop) → Prop), Eq (a (skS.0 0 a a_1)) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #12 (by fluidSup #[7, 7]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq ((fun _ => a) True) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #19 (by betaEtaReduce #[12]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq a True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #20 (by falseElim #[19]): False
% 3.55/3.74 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------