TSTP Solution File: SEV288^5 by Vampire---4.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.9
% Problem  : SEV288^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:02:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  137 (  60 equ;   3 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  183 (  34   ~;  33   |;   0   &;  81   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (  34   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (   8 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  12  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  44   ^   8   !;   0   ?;  52   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK4: a > $o ).

thf(f65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f31,f36,f41,f56,f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f63]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f40,f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK4 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f35,f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( sK3 = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( ( sK4 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK4 @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK4 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f43,f29,f25]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
          = $false )
        | ( $true
          = ( X1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( X1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f25,f38]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( sK3 != sK2 )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK4 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK4 @ sK2 )
       => ( sK4 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( sK3 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) )
        @ sK4 ) )
    | ( sK3 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( sK3 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 = sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = sK3 )
   != ( !! @ ( a > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
         => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = sK3 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y1 @ sK2 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y1 @ sK2 )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( (=) @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( (=) @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
   != (=) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] : ( Y0 = Y1 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a,Y1: a] :
          ( !! @ ( a > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : ( X3 = X4 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] :
        ! [X2: a > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = ( ^ [X0: a,X1: a] : ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cE1_eq__pme) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f18,f25,f33]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( sK3 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f29,f25]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
        = $false )
      | ( sK3 = sK2 )
      | ( $true
        = ( X1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( sK3 = sK2 )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( X1 @ sK2 )
         => ( X1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
              ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
             => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( sK3 = sK2 ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( sK3 = sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 = sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( !! @ ( a > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
            ( ( Y0 @ sK2 )
           => ( Y0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SEV288^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 18:29:39 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.37  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.37  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.37  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -m 16384 -t 300
% 0.14/0.39  % (29184)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29185)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29190)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29188)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29187)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29186)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29190)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29189)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (29183)Success in time 0.02 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------