TSTP Solution File: SEV240^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV240^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:54:04 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 4 &; 16 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 ^ 6 !; 2 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
cA: ( a > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_0: a > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk1_0: a ).
thf(cDOMTHM1_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: a > $o] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ! [X2: a] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
=> ? [X3: a > $o] :
( ( cA @ X3 )
& ( X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UoFQQRPbqS/E---3.1_1529.p',cDOMTHM1_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: a > $o] :
( ( cA @ X1 )
=> ! [X2: a] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
=> ? [X3: a > $o] :
( ( cA @ X3 )
& ( X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cDOMTHM1_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X9: a > $o] :
( ( cA @ epred1_0 )
& ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
& ( ~ ( cA @ X9 )
| ~ ( X9 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: a > $o] :
( ~ ( cA @ X1 )
| ~ ( X1 @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
cA @ epred1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEV240^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 18:52:24 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UoFQQRPbqS/E---3.1_1529.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_ho_8 with pid 1615 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_8
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,10,,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HUHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 1617 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,10,,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HUHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 210
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 79
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------