TSTP Solution File: SEV228^5 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV228^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:24:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.66s 3.82s
% Output   : Proof 3.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEV228^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 04:15:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.66/3.82  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.82  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (Xx : a), cS Xx → Exists fun S_11 => And (∀ (Xx0 : a), S_11 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (S_11 Xx))) True
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (Xx : a), cS Xx → Exists fun S_11 => And (∀ (Xx0 : a), S_11 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (S_11 Xx)) False
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : a),
% 3.66/3.82    Eq (Not (cS (skS.0 0 a_1) → Exists fun S_11 => And (∀ (Xx0 : a), S_11 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (S_11 (skS.0 0 a_1)))) True
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (cS (skS.0 0 a_1) → Exists fun S_11 => And (∀ (Xx0 : a), S_11 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (S_11 (skS.0 0 a_1))) False
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (cS (skS.0 0 a_1)) True
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (Exists fun S_11 => And (∀ (Xx0 : a), S_11 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (S_11 (skS.0 0 a_1))) False
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a), Eq (And (∀ (Xx0 : a), a_1 Xx0 → cS Xx0) (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2))) False
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 : a), Or (Eq (∀ (Xx0 : a), a_1 Xx0 → cS Xx0) False) (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2)) False)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a),
% 3.66/3.82    Or (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2)) False) (Eq (Not (a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3) → cS (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3))) True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a),
% 3.66/3.82    Or (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2)) False) (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3) → cS (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3)) False)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a), Or (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2)) False) (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3)) True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 : a → Prop) (a_2 a_3 : a), Or (Eq (a_1 (skS.0 0 a_2)) False) (Eq (cS (skS.0 1 a_1 a_3)) False)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #12 (by superposition #[10, 4]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Or (Eq ((fun x => cS x) (skS.0 1 (fun x => cS x) a_1)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #21 (by betaEtaReduce #[12]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Or (Eq (cS (skS.0 1 cS a_1)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (cS (skS.0 1 cS a_1)) True
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #25 (by superposition #[11, 4]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Or (Eq (cS (skS.0 1 (fun x => cS x) a_1)) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #39 (by betaEtaReduce #[25]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Or (Eq (cS (skS.0 1 cS a_1)) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a_1 : a), Eq (cS (skS.0 1 cS a_1)) False
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #41 (by superposition #[40, 22]): Eq False True
% 3.66/3.82  Clause #44 (by clausification #[41]): False
% 3.66/3.82  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------