TSTP Solution File: SEV225^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV225^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:54:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 4 &; 18 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 ^ 6 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
r: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
c0: r ).
thf(decl_23,type,
less: r > r > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW: $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk1_0: r ).
thf(cPARNAS_FIG3_A,conjecture,
( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
=> ! [X1: r] :
~ ( ( less @ X1 @ c0 )
& ( X1 = c0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xmzolEv7Fh/E---3.1_14304.p',cPARNAS_FIG3_A) ).
thf(cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_def,axiom,
( cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW
<=> ! [X1: r] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xmzolEv7Fh/E---3.1_14304.p',cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_def) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X4: r] :
~ ( less @ X4 @ X4 )
=> ! [X1: r] :
~ ( ( less @ X1 @ c0 )
& ( X1 = c0 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cPARNAS_FIG3_A]),cIRREFLEXIVE_LAW_def])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X5: r] :
( ~ ( less @ X5 @ X5 )
& ( less @ esk1_0 @ c0 )
& ( esk1_0 = c0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
less @ esk1_0 @ c0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = c0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
less @ c0 @ c0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: r] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEV225^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 18:56:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xmzolEv7Fh/E---3.1_14304.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # sh5l with pid 14455 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 14463 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 166
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 63
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------