TSTP Solution File: SEV214^5 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SEV214^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:53:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   2 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 ( 108 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   47 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  268 (  49   ~;  72   |;  26   &; 111   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   30 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   6   ^  34   !;   4   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    iS: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    c0: iS ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    cP: iS > iS > iS ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    esk1_1: ( iS > $o ) > iS ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk2_1: ( iS > $o ) > iS ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk3_0: iS ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk4_0: iS ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk5_0: iS ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk6_0: iS ).

thf(cS_T_LR_LEM2_pme,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X1: iS,X2: iS] :
          ( ( cP @ X1 @ X2 )
         != c0 )
      & ! [X1: iS,X2: iS,X3: iS,X4: iS] :
          ( ( ( cP @ X1 @ X3 )
            = ( cP @ X2 @ X4 ) )
         => ( ( X1 = X2 )
            & ( X3 = X4 ) ) )
      & ! [X5: iS > $o] :
          ( ( ( X5 @ c0 )
            & ! [X1: iS,X2: iS] :
                ( ( ( X5 @ X1 )
                  & ( X5 @ X2 ) )
               => ( X5 @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
         => ! [X1: iS] : ( X5 @ X1 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( ^ [X1: iS] :
              ( ( X1 = c0 )
              | ? [X2: iS] :
                  ( c0
                  = ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X1: iS,X2: iS] : ( X1 = X2 )
          @ c0 ) )
      & ( ( ^ [X2: iS] :
              ( ( X2 = c0 )
              | ? [X1: iS] :
                  ( c0
                  = ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X1: iS,X2: iS] : ( X1 = X2 )
          @ c0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pOhQF8xMK1/E---3.1_5572.p',cS_T_LR_LEM2_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: iS,X2: iS] :
            ( ( cP @ X1 @ X2 )
           != c0 )
        & ! [X1: iS,X2: iS,X3: iS,X4: iS] :
            ( ( ( cP @ X1 @ X3 )
              = ( cP @ X2 @ X4 ) )
           => ( ( X1 = X2 )
              & ( X3 = X4 ) ) )
        & ! [X5: iS > $o] :
            ( ( ( X5 @ c0 )
              & ! [X1: iS,X2: iS] :
                  ( ( ( X5 @ X1 )
                    & ( X5 @ X2 ) )
                 => ( X5 @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
           => ! [X1: iS] : ( X5 @ X1 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X16: iS] :
            ( ( ( X16 = c0 )
              | ? [X2: iS] :
                  ( c0
                  = ( cP @ X16 @ X2 ) ) )
          <=> ( c0 = X16 ) )
        & ! [X17: iS] :
            ( ( ( X17 = c0 )
              | ? [X1: iS] :
                  ( c0
                  = ( cP @ X1 @ X17 ) ) )
          <=> ( c0 = X17 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cS_T_LR_LEM2_pme])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X18: iS,X19: iS,X20: iS,X21: iS,X22: iS,X23: iS,X24: iS > $o,X27: iS,X29: iS,X32: iS] :
      ( ( ( cP @ X18 @ X19 )
       != c0 )
      & ( ( X20 = X21 )
        | ( ( cP @ X20 @ X22 )
         != ( cP @ X21 @ X23 ) ) )
      & ( ( X22 = X23 )
        | ( ( cP @ X20 @ X22 )
         != ( cP @ X21 @ X23 ) ) )
      & ( ( X24 @ ( esk1_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ~ ( X24 @ c0 )
        | ( X24 @ X27 ) )
      & ( ( X24 @ ( esk2_1 @ X24 ) )
        | ~ ( X24 @ c0 )
        | ( X24 @ X27 ) )
      & ( ~ ( X24 @ ( cP @ ( esk1_1 @ X24 ) @ ( esk2_1 @ X24 ) ) )
        | ~ ( X24 @ c0 )
        | ( X24 @ X27 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( c0
         != ( cP @ X32 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( c0
         != ( cP @ esk3_0 @ X29 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( c0
         != ( cP @ X32 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( c0
         != ( cP @ esk3_0 @ X29 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk5_0 )
        | ( c0
         != ( cP @ esk3_0 @ X29 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 != c0 )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( c0
         != ( cP @ X32 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk5_0 )
        | ( esk3_0 = c0 )
        | ( c0
          = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( c0 = esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( c0 = esk3_0 )
    | ( esk5_0 != c0 )
    | ( c0 != esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk5_0 != c0 )
    | ( c0 != esk5_0 )
    | ( esk3_0 != c0 )
    | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( c0 = esk5_0 )
    | ( esk3_0 != c0 )
    | ( c0 != esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( c0 = esk5_0 )
    | ( esk3_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( c0 = esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( esk5_0 != c0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 != c0 )
    | ( esk5_0 != c0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk5_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( esk3_0 != c0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 = c0 )
    | ( esk5_0 = c0 )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( c0
      = ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = c0 )
    | ( esk5_0 != c0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 )
      = c0 )
    | ( esk3_0 != c0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( cP @ esk6_0 @ esk5_0 )
      = c0 )
    | ( ( cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = c0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: iS,X2: iS] :
      ( ( cP @ X1 @ X2 )
     != c0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEV214^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 19:39:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pOhQF8xMK1/E---3.1_5572.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # post_as_ho12 with pid 5650 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # new_ho_10 with pid 5659 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 9
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 5
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 17
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 9
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1298
% 0.21/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 474
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------