TSTP Solution File: SEV189^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV189^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:53:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : SEV189^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 19:27:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.r7VG0hsnFq/E---3.1_7884.p
% 0.15/0.40 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best4_fo with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 600s (2) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting lpo1_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # ehoh_best4_fo with pid 7962 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Result found by ehoh_best4_fo
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best4_fo with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-MHHFFSBN
% 0.15/0.40 # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 649s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best4_fo with 121s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho9 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting post_as_ho7 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # ehoh_best4_fo with pid 7968 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Result found by ehoh_best4_fo
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best4_fo with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-MHHFFSBN
% 0.15/0.40 # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 649s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best4_fo with 121s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_sort1, type, b: $tType).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_22, type, cQ: (b > $o) > $o).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_23, type, cP: (b > $o) > $o).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_24, type, epred1_1: ((b > $o) > $o) > b > $o).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_25, type, epred2_1: ((b > $o) > $o) > b > $o).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_26, type, epred3_0: (b > $o) > $o).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(cTHM567_pme, conjecture, ((![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(cP @ X2)))=>(cP @ (^[X3:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X4 @ X3))))))))&![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(cQ @ X2)))=>(cQ @ (^[X5:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X4 @ X5)))))))))=>![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>((cP @ X2)&(cQ @ X2))))=>((cP @ (^[X6:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X4 @ X6))))))&(cQ @ (^[X7:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X4 @ X7)))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.r7VG0hsnFq/E---3.1_7884.p', cTHM567_pme)).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(cP @ X2)))=>(cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X1 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0)))))))&![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(cQ @ X2)))=>(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X1 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0))))))))=>![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:((![X2:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>((cP @ X2)&(cQ @ X2))))=>((cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X1 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0)))))&(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X1 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM567_pme])])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X14:(b > $o) > $o, X16:(b > $o) > $o, X19:b > $o]:((((((X14 @ (epred1_1 @ X14))|(cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X14 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0))))))&(~(cP @ (epred1_1 @ X14))|(cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X14 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0)))))))&(((X16 @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X16 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0))))))&(~(cQ @ (epred2_1 @ X16))|(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((X16 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0))))))))&((((cP @ X19)|~(epred3_0 @ X19))&((cQ @ X19)|~(epred3_0 @ X19)))&(~(cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((epred3_0 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0)))))|~(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X4:b > $o]:((epred3_0 @ X4=>X4 @ Z0))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X20:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X20)=>(X20 @ Z0)))))))|~((cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X21:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X21)=>(X21 @ Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X22:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X22)=>(X22 @ Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_0 @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0))|~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X23:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X23)=>(X23 @ Z0)))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1))|(cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X24:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X24)=>(X24 @ Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:b > $o]:(((cP @ X2)|~((epred3_0 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_0 @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0))|(epred3_0 @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:b > $o]:(((cQ @ X2)|~((epred3_0 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_0 @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0))|(cP @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:(((cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X25:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X25)=>(X25 @ Z0))))))|~((cQ @ (epred2_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((cP @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0))|(cQ @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X26:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X26)=>(X26 @ Z0))))))|(cP @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((cP @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0))|~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X27:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X27)=>(X27 @ Z0)))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(b > $o) > $o]:(((cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X28:b > $o]:(((X1 @ X28)=>(X28 @ Z0))))))|~((cP @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (cP @ (epred1_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_6]), c_0_7])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (cP @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X29:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X29)=>(X29 @ Z0)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_17])])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (cQ @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_18])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ~((cQ @ (^[Z0/* 6 */:b]:(![X30:b > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ X30)=>(X30 @ Z0))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_17])])).
% 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.40 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.15/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.15/0.40 # Processed clauses : 35
% 0.15/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.15/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.15/0.40 # Generated clauses : 44
% 0.15/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44
% 0.15/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.40 # Paramodulations : 20
% 0.15/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # NegExts : 2
% 0.15/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.15/0.40 # ...of those cached : 6
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.15/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 58
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.15/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% 0.15/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.15/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.15/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3804
% 0.15/0.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 285
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.15/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------