TSTP Solution File: SEV166^5 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SEV166^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:53:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  10   ~;  10   |;   4   &;  44   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  16   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2   ^  14   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    esk1_0: a ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    esk2_0: a ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk4_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk5_0: a > a > a ).

thf(cTHM182_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( ( ^ [X5: a > a > a] : ( X5 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
        = ( ^ [X5: a > a > a] : ( X5 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    <=> ( ( X1 = X3 )
        & ( X2 = X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5dlla1rGkD/E---3.1_17781.p',cTHM182_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a,X4: a] :
        ( ! [X10: a > a > a] :
            ( ( X10 @ X1 @ X2 )
            = ( X10 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      <=> ( ( X1 = X3 )
          & ( X2 = X4 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM182_pme])])]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X16: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ( ( esk5_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
         != ( esk5_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( esk1_0 != esk3_0 )
        | ( esk2_0 != esk4_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk1_0 = esk3_0 )
        | ( ( X16 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
          = ( X16 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0 = esk4_0 )
        | ( ( X16 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
          = ( X16 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 = esk3_0 )
      | ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        = ( X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk5_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
     != ( esk5_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( esk1_0 != esk3_0 )
    | ( esk2_0 != esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 = esk4_0 )
      | ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        = ( X5 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk5_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
     != ( esk5_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( esk2_0 != esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        = ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      | ( esk2_0 = esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a > a > a] :
      ( ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = ( X5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != esk4_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEV166^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 19:08:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5dlla1rGkD/E---3.1_17781.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # post_as_ho2 with pid 17859 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by post_as_ho2
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: HGHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFMNN
% 0.21/0.51  # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_9 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # new_ho_10 with pid 17865 completed with status 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 130s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # new_bool_1 with pid 17868 completed with status 9
% 0.21/0.51  # new_bool_9 with pid 17870 completed with status 9
% 0.21/0.51  # post_as_ho2 with pid 17866 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by post_as_ho2
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: HGHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFMNN
% 0.21/0.51  # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 11
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 82
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 70
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 12
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of those cached                   : 6
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 59
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3076
% 0.21/0.51  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 114
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------