TSTP Solution File: SEV163^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV163^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:53:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 8 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 32 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 22 ( 22 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 40 ^ 2 !; 0 ?; 42 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
esk1_0: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(cTHM187_pme,conjecture,
! [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
( ( X1
= ( ^ [X2: a > a > a] :
( X2
@ ( X1
@ ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : X3 )
@ ( X1
@ ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : X4 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( ^ [X2: a > a > a] :
( X2
@ ( X1
@ ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : X3 )
@ ( X1
@ ^ [X3: a,X4: a] : X4 ) ) )
= X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EAFf62QMJk/E---3.1_23986.p',cTHM187_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: ( a > a > a ) > a] :
( ( X1
= ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( X1
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( X1
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( X1
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( X1
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) )
= X1 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM187_pme])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk1_0
= ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) ) )
& ( ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) )
!= esk1_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) )
!= esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_0
= ( ^ [Z0: a > a > a] :
( Z0
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z1 )
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z1: a,Z2: a] : Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SEV163^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 19:33:23 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.EAFf62QMJk/E---3.1_23986.p
% 0.14/0.39 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSLNHHN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # sh5l with pid 24065 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSLNHHN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.39 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MHHFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # new_ho_10 with pid 24070 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSLNHHN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.39 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MHHFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 174
% 0.14/0.39 # Search garbage collected termcells : 33
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.39 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.14/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.14/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------