TSTP Solution File: SEV051^5 by E---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.2.0
% Problem : SEV051^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:53:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 24 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 6 &; 0 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 ^ 8 !; 0 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
esk1_0: a ).
thf(decl_23,type,
esk2_0: a ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk3_0: a ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk4_0: a ).
thf(cTHM557_pme,conjecture,
( ! [X1: a] : ( X1 = X1 )
& ! [X2: a,X3: a,X4: a] :
( ( ( X2 = X4 )
& ( X3 = X4 ) )
=> ( X2 = X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I3PS3r8YE3/E---3.1_945.p',cTHM557_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: a] : ( X1 = X1 )
& ! [X2: a,X3: a,X4: a] :
( ( ( X2 = X4 )
& ( X3 = X4 ) )
=> ( X2 = X3 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM557_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( esk2_0 = esk4_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) )
& ( ( esk2_0 != esk3_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk2_0 = esk4_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk2_0 != esk3_0 )
| ( esk1_0 != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 = esk3_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 = esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = esk2_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SEV051^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 18:33:39 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I3PS3r8YE3/E---3.1_945.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 1057 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # new_ho_10 with pid 1061 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 161
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 69
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------