TSTP Solution File: SEU930^5 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SEU930^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:44:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.68s 3.89s
% Output : Proof 3.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU930^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 12:20:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.68/3.89 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/3.89 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.68/3.89 (Not
% 3.68/3.89 ((Eq (fun Xx => f (g Xx)) fun Xx => g (f Xx)) →
% 3.68/3.89 ∀ (Xx : Iota), And (Eq (g Xx) Xx) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz Xx) → Eq (f Xx) Xx))
% 3.68/3.89 True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.68/3.89 ((Eq (fun Xx => f (g Xx)) fun Xx => g (f Xx)) →
% 3.68/3.89 ∀ (Xx : Iota), And (Eq (g Xx) Xx) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz Xx) → Eq (f Xx) Xx)
% 3.68/3.89 False
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Eq (fun Xx => f (g Xx)) fun Xx => g (f Xx)) True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (Xx : Iota), And (Eq (g Xx) Xx) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz Xx) → Eq (f Xx) Xx) False
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (fun Xx => f (g Xx)) fun Xx => g (f Xx)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #5 (by argument congruence #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq ((fun Xx => f (g Xx)) a) ((fun Xx => g (f Xx)) a)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #6 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.68/3.89 Eq
% 3.68/3.89 (Not
% 3.68/3.89 (And (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz (skS.0 0 a)) →
% 3.68/3.89 Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)))
% 3.68/3.89 True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.68/3.89 Eq
% 3.68/3.89 (And (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz (skS.0 0 a)) →
% 3.68/3.89 Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a))
% 3.68/3.89 False
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xz : Iota), Eq (g Xz) Xz → Eq Xz (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #11 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (g a) a → Eq a (skS.0 0 a_1)) True
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (g a) a) False) (Eq (Eq a (skS.0 0 a_1)) True)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq a (skS.0 0 a_1)) True) (Ne (g a) a)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Ne (g a) a) (Eq a (skS.0 0 a_1))
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #16 (by betaEtaReduce #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f (g a)) (g (f a))
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #17 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #19 (by superposition #[17, 16]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (g (f (skS.0 0 a)))
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #20 (by superposition #[19, 15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Ne (f (skS.0 0 a)) (f (skS.0 0 a))) (Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a_1))
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #22 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Ne (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #32 (by eliminate resolved literals #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a_1)
% 3.68/3.89 Clause #33 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[32, 22]): False
% 3.68/3.89 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------