TSTP Solution File: SEU927^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU927^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:52:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   6 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  35 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  141 (  17   ~;   8   |;  14   &;  93   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (  34   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (  36   ^  18   !;   6   ?;  61   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: a > a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: ( a > a ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    & ! [X2: a > a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ X2 ) ) )
    & ( $true
      = ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        & ! [X2: a > a] :
            ( ( $true
              = ( X1
                @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
            | ( $true
             != ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) )
   => ( ( $true
       != ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X2: a > a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( sK1
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( sK1 @ X2 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X2: a > a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( X1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      & ! [X2: a > a] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X2: a > a] :
              ( ( $true
                = ( X1 @ X2 ) )
             => ( $true
                = ( X1
                  @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( X1
              @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( X1
            @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X2: a > a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( X1
                @ ^ [X3: a] : ( X0 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
          & ( X1
            @ ^ [X4: a] : X4 ) )
       => ( X1
          @ ^ [X5: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a > a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 )
             => ( X1
                @ ^ [X4: a] : ( X0 @ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ) )
          & ( X1
            @ ^ [X2: a] : X2 ) )
       => ( X1
          @ ^ [X4: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > a,X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a > a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X1
              @ ^ [X4: a] : ( X0 @ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ) )
        & ( X1
          @ ^ [X2: a] : X2 ) )
     => ( X1
        @ ^ [X4: a] : ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM92_pme) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( sK0
          @ ( ^ [Y1: a] : Y1
            @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( sK0
            @ ( ^ [Y1: a] : Y1
              @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: a] : Y0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X2: a > a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1
          @ ^ [Y0: a] : ( sK0 @ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : SEU927^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.38  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 16:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.38  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.39  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  % (2256)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2255)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2258)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2260)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2261)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2262)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2259)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.40  % (2257)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2259)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2258)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2260)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.41  % (2261)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.41  % (2257)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2262)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (2254)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------