TSTP Solution File: SEU925^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU925^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:52:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU925^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 16:22:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.36 % (15934)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.19/0.36 % (15931)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.36 % (15934)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.37 % (15931)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.37 thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 $false),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f9])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 (sK0 != sK1)),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ((^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 = Y0))) & (sK0 != sK1)),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ? [X0,X1] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 = Y0))) & (X0 != X1)) => (((^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 = Y0))) & (sK0 != sK1))),
% 0.19/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ? [X0,X1] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 = Y0))) & (X0 != X1))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ~! [X0,X1] : (((^[Y0 : $i]: (X1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 = Y0))) => (X0 = X1))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ~! [X0,X1] : (((^[X2 : $i] : ((X0 = X2))) = (^[X3 : $i] : ((X1 = X3)))) => (X0 = X1))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.37 ~! [X1,X0] : (((^[X3 : $i] : ((X1 = X3))) = (^[X2 : $i] : ((X0 = X2)))) => (X0 = X1))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.19/0.37 ! [X1,X0] : (((^[X3 : $i] : ((X1 = X3))) = (^[X2 : $i] : ((X0 = X2)))) => (X0 = X1))),
% 0.19/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM7_TPS2_pme)).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 (sK0 = sK1)),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f16])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((sK0 != X1) | (sK1 = X1)) )),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f15])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = (sK1 = X1)) | (sK0 != X1)) )),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f14])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (sK0 = X1)) | ($true = (sK1 = X1))) )),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 = X1) = (sK1 = X1))) )),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(argument_congruence,[],[f11])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ((= @ sK0) = (= @ sK1))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f10])).
% 0.19/0.37 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.19/0.37 ((^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 = Y0)) = (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 = Y0)))),
% 0.19/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.19/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (15934)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37 % (15927)Success in time 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------