TSTP Solution File: SEU858^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEU858^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:30:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU858^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 17:17:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 23580 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # post_as_ho10 with pid 23587 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by post_as_ho10
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-MHHFFFBN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: (a > $o) > $o).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(cTHM163_pme, conjecture, ![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:((((X1 @ (^[X2:a]:(~($true))))&![X3:a > $o, X2:a]:(((X1 @ X3)=>(X1 @ (^[X4:a]:(((X3 @ X4)|((X4)=(X2)))))))))=>(X1 @ (^[X2:a]:(~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM163_pme)).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:((((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~($true))))&![X3:a > $o, X2:a]:(((X1 @ X3)=>(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:((X3 @ Z0|((Z0)=(X2)))))))))=>(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM163_pme])])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9:a > $o, X10:a]:((((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~($true))))&(~(epred1_0 @ X9)|(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:((X9 @ Z0|((Z0)=(X10))))))))&~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~($true)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~(($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:a]:(~(($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:a]:(~($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:a]:(~($true))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 338
% 0.21/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 111
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------