TSTP Solution File: SEU787_8 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SEU787_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:32:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SEU787_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 07:40:56 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.728sZmfaG1/E---3.1_3457.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_1 with pid 3536 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3541 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_22, type, in: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_23, type, binunion: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_24, type, kpair: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_25, type, breln1: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_26, type, breln1unionE: $o).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_27, type, esk1_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_28, type, esk2_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_29, type, esk3_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_30, type, esk4_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_31, type, esk5_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_32, type, epred1_0: $o).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_33, type, esk6_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_34, type, esk7_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_35, type, esk8_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_36, type, esk9_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 tff(decl_37, type, esk10_0: $i).
% 0.15/0.42 fof(breln1unionEcases, conjecture, (breln1unionE=>![X1, X2]:((breln1(X1,X2)=>![X3]:((breln1(X1,X3)=>![X4]:((in(X4,X1)=>![X5]:((in(X5,X1)=>(in(kpair(X4,X5),binunion(X2,X3))=>![X6:$o]:(((in(kpair(X4,X5),X2)=>X6)=>((in(kpair(X4,X5),X3)=>X6)=>X6))))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.728sZmfaG1/E---3.1_3457.p', breln1unionEcases)).
% 0.15/0.42 fof(breln1unionE, axiom, (breln1unionE<=>![X1, X2]:((breln1(X1,X2)=>![X3]:((breln1(X1,X3)=>![X4]:((in(X4,X1)=>![X5]:((in(X5,X1)=>(in(kpair(X4,X5),binunion(X2,X3))=>(in(kpair(X4,X5),X2)|in(kpair(X4,X5),X3)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.728sZmfaG1/E---3.1_3457.p', breln1unionE)).
% 0.15/0.42 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~((breln1unionE=>![X1, X2]:((breln1(X1,X2)=>![X3]:((breln1(X1,X3)=>![X4]:((in(X4,X1)=>![X5]:((in(X5,X1)=>(in(kpair(X4,X5),binunion(X2,X3))=>![X6:$o]:(((in(kpair(X4,X5),X2)=>X6)=>((in(kpair(X4,X5),X3)=>X6)=>X6)))))))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[breln1unionEcases])).
% 0.15/0.42 fof(c_0_3, plain, ![X13, X14, X15, X16, X17]:(((~breln1unionE|(~breln1(X13,X14)|(~breln1(X13,X15)|(~in(X16,X13)|(~in(X17,X13)|(~in(kpair(X16,X17),binunion(X14,X15))|(in(kpair(X16,X17),X14)|in(kpair(X16,X17),X15))))))))&((breln1(esk6_0,esk7_0)|breln1unionE)&((breln1(esk6_0,esk8_0)|breln1unionE)&((in(esk9_0,esk6_0)|breln1unionE)&((in(esk10_0,esk6_0)|breln1unionE)&((in(kpair(esk9_0,esk10_0),binunion(esk7_0,esk8_0))|breln1unionE)&((~in(kpair(esk9_0,esk10_0),esk7_0)|breln1unionE)&(~in(kpair(esk9_0,esk10_0),esk8_0)|breln1unionE))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[breln1unionE])])])])])).
% 0.15/0.42 fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (breln1unionE&(breln1(esk1_0,esk2_0)&(breln1(esk1_0,esk3_0)&(in(esk4_0,esk1_0)&(in(esk5_0,esk1_0)&(in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),binunion(esk2_0,esk3_0))&((~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk2_0)|epred1_0)&((~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk3_0)|epred1_0)&~epred1_0)))))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_5, plain, (in(kpair(X4,X5),X2)|in(kpair(X4,X5),X3)|~breln1unionE|~breln1(X1,X2)|~breln1(X1,X3)|~in(X4,X1)|~in(X5,X1)|~in(kpair(X4,X5),binunion(X2,X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (breln1unionE), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0|~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~epred1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0|~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_10, plain, (in(kpair(X1,X2),X3)|in(kpair(X1,X2),X4)|~breln1(X5,X4)|~breln1(X5,X3)|~in(kpair(X1,X2),binunion(X3,X4))|~in(X2,X5)|~in(X1,X5)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),binunion(esk2_0,esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~in(kpair(esk4_0,esk5_0),esk2_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_8])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~breln1(X1,esk3_0)|~breln1(X1,esk2_0)|~in(esk5_0,X1)|~in(esk4_0,X1)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (breln1(esk1_0,esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (breln1(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (in(esk5_0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (in(esk4_0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.15/0.42 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_17]), c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 28
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1008
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------