TSTP Solution File: SEU709_8 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : SEU709_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:00:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.70s 1.62s
% Output   : Refutation 3.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  11 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  18 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  151 (   4   ~;   0   |;   1   &; 106   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  39  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0   ^;  44   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_type,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(emptyset_type,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(setadjoin_type,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(setadjoinIL_type,type,
    setadjoinIL: $o ).

thf(in__Cong_type,type,
    in__Cong: $o ).

thf(secondinupair_type,type,
    secondinupair: $o ).

thf(if_type,type,
    if: $i > $o > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(iftrue_type,type,
    iftrue: $o ).

thf(iffalse_type,type,
    iffalse: $o ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ( setadjoinIL
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( in @ A @ ( setadjoin @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinIL) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( setadjoinIL
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( in @ A @ ( setadjoin @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ( secondinupair
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( in @ B @ ( setadjoin @ A @ ( setadjoin @ B @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',secondinupair) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( secondinupair
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( in @ B @ ( setadjoin @ A @ ( setadjoin @ B @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( iffalse
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ A )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( ~ B
               => ( ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                  = D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',iffalse) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( iffalse
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ A )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( ~ B
               => ( ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                  = D ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ( in__Cong
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A = B )
         => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( C = D )
             => ( ( in @ C @ A )
              <=> ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in__Cong) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( in__Cong
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A = B )
         => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( C = D )
             => ( ( ( in @ C @ A )
                 => ( in @ D @ B ) )
                & ( ( in @ D @ B )
                 => ( in @ C @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( setadjoinIL
   => ( in__Cong
     => ( secondinupair
       => ( iftrue
         => ( iffalse
           => ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ A )
               => ! [D: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ D @ A )
                   => ( in @ ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D ) @ ( setadjoin @ C @ ( setadjoin @ D @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',iftrueorfalse) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( in__Cong
       => ( secondinupair
         => ( iftrue
           => ( iffalse
             => ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ A )
                 => ! [D: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ D @ A )
                     => ( in @ ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D ) @ ( setadjoin @ C @ ( setadjoin @ D @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ( setadjoinIL
     => ( in__Cong
       => ( secondinupair
         => ( iftrue
           => ( iffalse
             => ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ C @ A )
                 => ! [D: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ D @ A )
                     => ( in @ ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D ) @ ( setadjoin @ C @ ( setadjoin @ D @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( iftrue
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ A )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( B
               => ( ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                  = C ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',iftrue) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( iftrue
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ A )
         => ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( in @ D @ A )
             => ( B
               => ( ( if @ A @ B @ C @ D )
                  = C ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,21,17,23,8,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SEU709_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May 18 12:46:46 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.93/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.20/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (124ms). 
% 1.20/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.61/1.16  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.61/1.16  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.61/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.71/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.71/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.71/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.71/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.71/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.89/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.99/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.99/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.99/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.99/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.99/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.99/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 1.99/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 1.99/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.99/1.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.70/1.61  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.70/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.70/1.62  % Time passed: 1104ms (effective reasoning time: 648ms)
% 2.70/1.62  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.70/1.62  % Axioms used in derivation (5): secondinupair, setadjoinIL, iffalse, in__Cong, iftrue
% 2.70/1.62  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 2.70/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1104 ms resp. 648 ms w/o parsing
% 3.10/1.71  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.10/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------