TSTP Solution File: SEU649^2 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEU649^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:28:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   6 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  113 (  50 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  468 (  27   ~;  45   |;   9   &; 356   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   26 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0   ^  75   !;   0   ?;  75   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    emptyset: $i ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    setadjoin: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    setext: $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    setadjoinIL: $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    uniqinunit: $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    eqinunit: $o ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    upairset2E: $o ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    esk1_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    esk2_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_33,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(setukpairinjR11,conjecture,
    ( setext
   => ( setadjoinIL
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ( eqinunit
         => ( upairset2E
           => ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
                ( ( X3 = X4 )
               => ( ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
                  = ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setukpairinjR11) ).

thf(setext,axiom,
    ( setext
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ! [X3: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
           => ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
       => ( ! [X3: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X3 @ X2 )
             => ( in @ X3 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setext) ).

thf(setadjoinIL,axiom,
    ( setadjoinIL
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinIL) ).

thf(uniqinunit,axiom,
    ( uniqinunit
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
       => ( X3 = X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uniqinunit) ).

thf(eqinunit,axiom,
    ( eqinunit
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
        ( ( X3 = X4 )
       => ( in @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eqinunit) ).

thf(upairset2E,axiom,
    ( upairset2E
  <=> ! [X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X5 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) ) )
       => ( ( X5 = X3 )
          | ( X5 = X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',upairset2E) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X21: $i,X22: $i] :
          ( ! [X23: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X23 @ X21 )
             => ( in @ X23 @ X22 ) )
         => ( ! [X24: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X24 @ X22 )
               => ( in @ X24 @ X21 ) )
           => ( X21 = X22 ) ) )
     => ( ! [X25: $i,X26: $i] : ( in @ X25 @ ( setadjoin @ X25 @ X26 ) )
       => ( ! [X27: $i,X28: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X27 @ ( setadjoin @ X28 @ emptyset ) )
             => ( X27 = X28 ) )
         => ( ! [X29: $i,X30: $i] :
                ( ( X29 = X30 )
               => ( in @ X29 @ ( setadjoin @ X30 @ emptyset ) ) )
           => ( ! [X31: $i,X32: $i,X33: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X33 @ ( setadjoin @ X31 @ ( setadjoin @ X32 @ emptyset ) ) )
                 => ( ( X33 = X31 )
                    | ( X33 = X32 ) ) )
             => ! [X3: $i,X4: $i] :
                  ( ( X3 = X4 )
                 => ( ( setadjoin @ X3 @ ( setadjoin @ X4 @ emptyset ) )
                    = ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[setukpairinjR11]),setext]),setadjoinIL]),uniqinunit]),eqinunit]),upairset2E]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X34: $i,X35: $i,X38: $i,X39: $i,X40: $i,X41: $i,X42: $i,X43: $i,X44: $i,X45: $i,X46: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X34 )
        | ( X34 = X35 )
        | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X35 ) )
      & ( in @ X38 @ ( setadjoin @ X38 @ X39 ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X40 @ ( setadjoin @ X41 @ emptyset ) )
        | ( X40 = X41 ) )
      & ( ( X42 != X43 )
        | ( in @ X42 @ ( setadjoin @ X43 @ emptyset ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X46 @ ( setadjoin @ X44 @ ( setadjoin @ X45 @ emptyset ) ) )
        | ( X46 = X44 )
        | ( X46 = X45 ) )
      & ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 )
      & ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk4_0 @ emptyset ) )
       != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( X1 = X3 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( X1
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( X1
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X3 )
      | ( ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( X1
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X3 @ emptyset ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk2_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk2_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
        = X2 )
      | ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) ) @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk4_0 @ emptyset ) )
   != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset )
        = ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X2 @ emptyset ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) )
   != ( setadjoin @ esk3_0 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( setadjoin @ X1 @ ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) )
      = ( setadjoin @ X1 @ emptyset ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU649^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:17:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 24492 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by lpo6_lambda_fix
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 24498 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by lpo6_lambda_fix
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFMFNN
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.19/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.19/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.19/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.19/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.19/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 54
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.19/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 49
% 0.19/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.19/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 25
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 18
% 0.19/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.19/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 59
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.19/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 178
% 0.19/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131
% 0.19/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.19/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.19/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 33
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2990
% 0.19/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 404
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1820 pages
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.029 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.19/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------