TSTP Solution File: SEU614_8 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU614_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:32:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU614_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:44:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pktvEAbPYD/E---3.1_4934.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # sh5l with pid 5040 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5045 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_22, type, in: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_23, type, symdiff: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_24, type, symdiffE: $o).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_27, type, esk3_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_28, type, esk4_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_29, type, esk5_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_30, type, esk6_0: $i).
% 0.20/0.49  tff(decl_31, type, epred1_0: $o).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(symdiffE, axiom, (symdiffE<=>![X1, X2, X3]:((in(X3,symdiff(X1,X2))=>![X4:$o]:(((in(X3,X1)=>(~(in(X3,X2))=>X4))=>((~(in(X3,X1))=>(in(X3,X2)=>X4))=>X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pktvEAbPYD/E---3.1_4934.p', symdiffE)).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(symdiffIneg1, conjecture, (symdiffE=>![X1, X2, X3]:((in(X3,X1)=>(in(X3,X2)=>~(in(X3,symdiff(X1,X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pktvEAbPYD/E---3.1_4934.p', symdiffIneg1)).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(c_0_2, plain, (symdiffE<=>![X1, X2, X3]:((in(X3,symdiff(X1,X2))=>![X4:$o]:(((in(X3,X1)=>(~in(X3,X2)=>X4))=>((~in(X3,X1)=>(in(X3,X2)=>X4))=>X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symdiffE])).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((symdiffE=>![X1, X2, X3]:((in(X3,X1)=>(in(X3,X2)=>~in(X3,symdiff(X1,X2))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[symdiffIneg1])])).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X8, X9, X10, X11:$o]:(((((~in(X10,X8)|X11|in(X10,X8)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&((in(X10,X9)|X11|in(X10,X8)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&(~X11|X11|in(X10,X8)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)))&(((~in(X10,X8)|X11|~in(X10,X9)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&((in(X10,X9)|X11|~in(X10,X9)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&(~X11|X11|~in(X10,X9)|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)))&((~in(X10,X8)|X11|~X11|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&((in(X10,X9)|X11|~X11|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)&(~X11|X11|~X11|~in(X10,symdiff(X8,X9))|~symdiffE)))))&((in(esk6_0,symdiff(esk4_0,esk5_0))|symdiffE)&((~in(esk6_0,esk4_0)|(in(esk6_0,esk5_0)|epred1_0)|symdiffE)&((in(esk6_0,esk4_0)|(~in(esk6_0,esk5_0)|epred1_0)|symdiffE)&(~epred1_0|symdiffE)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])).
% 0.20/0.49  fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (symdiffE&(in(esk3_0,esk1_0)&(in(esk3_0,esk2_0)&in(esk3_0,symdiff(esk1_0,esk2_0))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_6, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,symdiff(X2,X3))|~symdiffE), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (symdiffE), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_8, plain, (~in(X1,symdiff(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (in(esk3_0,symdiff(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (in(esk3_0,esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (in(esk3_0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.20/0.49  cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 875
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------