TSTP Solution File: SEU603^2 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEU603^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:28:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  11   ~;   3   |;   2   &;  75   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  12   ^  26   !;   0   ?;  38   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    dsetconstr: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    dsetconstrER: $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    setminus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(dsetconstrER,axiom,
    ( dsetconstrER
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X3
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dsetconstrER) ).

thf(setminusER,conjecture,
    ( dsetconstrER
   => ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X3 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X5 ) )
       => ~ ( in @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminusER) ).

thf(setminus,axiom,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X5: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ X1
          @ ^ [X3: $i] :
              ~ ( in @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminus) ).

thf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( dsetconstrER
  <=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X3
          @ ( dsetconstr @ X1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( X2 @ Z0 ) ) )
       => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dsetconstrER]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X12: $i,X13: $i > $o,X14: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X14 @ ( dsetconstr @ X12 @ X13 ) )
         => ( X13 @ X14 ) )
     => ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X3 @ ( setminus @ X1 @ X5 ) )
         => ~ ( in @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[setminusER]),c_0_3])])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ Z0
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
              ~ ( in @ Z2 @ Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[setminus]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X15: $i,X16: $i > $o,X17: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( in @ X17 @ ( dsetconstr @ X15 @ X16 ) )
        | ( X16 @ X17 ) )
      & ( in @ esk3_0 @ ( setminus @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      & ( in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( dsetconstr @ Z0
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
              ~ ( in @ Z2 @ Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
      ( ( X2 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( dsetconstr @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( dsetconstr @ X1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ~ ( in @ Z0 @ X3 ) )
      = ( setminus @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ ( setminus @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk3_0 @ ( setminus @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SEU603^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 15:36:08 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFA.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting lpo8_s with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 18352 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFA.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: HHUSF-FFSS22-DSFFMSBN
% 0.17/0.46  # partial match(2): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMSBN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # new_ho_10 with pid 18355 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNSFA.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: HHUSF-FFSS22-DSFFMSBN
% 0.17/0.46  # partial match(2): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMSBN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.17/0.46  # Processed clauses                    : 11
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 0.17/0.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Generated clauses                    : 5
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.17/0.46  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.17/0.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.17/0.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation attempts                : 11
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 526
% 0.17/0.46  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 135
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------