TSTP Solution File: SEU573^2 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem  : SEU573^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:42:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.13s 2.15s
% Output   : Refutation 5.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   7 unt;   8 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  228 (  15   ~;  20   |;   0   &; 169   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  24  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0   ^  55   !;   0   ?;  55   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_type,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(powerset_type,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(powersetI_type,type,
    powersetI: $o ).

thf(powersetI_def,definition,
    ( powersetI
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ B )
             => ( in @ C @ A ) )
         => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(subset_type,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(subsetE_type,type,
    subsetE: $o ).

thf(subsetE_def,definition,
    ( subsetE
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( subset @ A @ B )
         => ( ( in @ C @ A )
           => ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( powersetI
   => ( subsetE
     => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( subset @ A @ B )
         => ( in @ A @ ( powerset @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset2powerset) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( powersetI
     => ( subsetE
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ A @ B )
           => ( in @ A @ ( powerset @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ B )
             => ( in @ C @ A ) )
         => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ A @ B )
           => ( ( in @ C @ A )
             => ( in @ C @ B ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ A @ B )
           => ( in @ A @ ( powerset @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ B )
             => ( in @ C @ A ) )
         => ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ A @ B )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ A )
               => ( in @ C @ B ) ) )
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( subset @ A @ B )
           => ( in @ A @ ( powerset @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    subset @ sk2 @ sk3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( subset @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( in @ C @ A )
      | ( in @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( subset @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( in @ C @ A )
      | ( in @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ~ ( subset @ C @ D )
      | ( in @ E @ D )
      | ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
       != ( in @ E @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5,10]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ C ) )
      | ~ ( subset @ B @ A )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ C ) @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[18:[bind(A,$thf( G )),bind(B,$thf( F )),bind(C,$thf( F )),bind(D,$thf( D )),bind(E,$thf( sk1 @ F @ G ))]]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ C ) )
      | ~ ( subset @ B @ A )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ C ) @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ C ) )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ C ) @ A )
      | ( ( subset @ sk2 @ sk3 )
       != ( subset @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[8,25]) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk2 @ A ) @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[55:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk2 @ A ) @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[56]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( in @ B @ ( powerset @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(199,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ A ) )
      | ( in @ C @ ( powerset @ B ) )
      | ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk2 @ A ) @ sk3 )
       != ( in @ ( sk1 @ C @ B ) @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[63,6]) ).

thf(200,plain,
    ( ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ sk3 ) )
    | ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[199:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 )),bind(C,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(216,plain,
    in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ sk3 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[200]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( in @ sk2 @ ( powerset @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(219,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[216,7]) ).

thf(220,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[219]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : SEU573^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.08/0.16  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.17/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % DateTime : Sun May 19 16:19:24 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.98/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.13/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (105ms). 
% 1.13/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.73/1.23  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.73/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.84/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.84/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.84/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.84/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.84/1.33  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.00/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.13/2.15  % Time passed: 1607ms (effective reasoning time: 1148ms)
% 5.13/2.15  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.13/2.15  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.13/2.15  % No. of inferences in proof: 21
% 5.13/2.15  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1607 ms resp. 1148 ms w/o parsing
% 5.13/2.19  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.13/2.19  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------