TSTP Solution File: SEU561^2 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : SEU561^2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 13:53:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_eigen__2,type,
eigen__2: $i ).
thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
eigen__1: $i ).
thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
eigen__0: $i ).
thf(ty_in,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> ( in @ eigen__2 @ eigen__0 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> ( eigen__0 = eigen__1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> ( in @ eigen__2 @ eigen__1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(sP4,plain,
( sP4
<=> ( eigen__2 = eigen__2 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).
thf(def_subset,definition,
( subset
= ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ).
thf(def_subsetI1,definition,
( subsetI1
= ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ).
thf(eqimpsubset1,conjecture,
( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ).
thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[eqimpsubset1]) ).
thf(h1,assumption,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h2,assumption,
~ ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h3,assumption,
~ ! [X1: $i] :
( ( eigen__0 = X1 )
=> ! [X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X2 @ eigen__0 )
=> ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h4,assumption,
~ ( sP2
=> ! [X1: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ eigen__0 )
=> ( in @ X1 @ eigen__1 ) ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h5,assumption,
sP2,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h6,assumption,
~ ! [X1: $i] :
( ( in @ X1 @ eigen__0 )
=> ( in @ X1 @ eigen__1 ) ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h7,assumption,
~ ( sP1
=> sP3 ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h8,assumption,
sP1,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h9,assumption,
~ sP3,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(1,plain,
sP4,
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(2,plain,
( ~ sP1
| sP3
| ~ sP4
| ~ sP2 ),
inference(mating_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(3,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h4,h3,h1,h2,h0])],[1,2,h5,h8,h9]) ).
thf(4,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h4,h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,3,h8,h9]) ).
thf(5,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h4,h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,4,h7]) ).
thf(6,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,5,h5,h6]) ).
thf(7,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h4]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h3,6,h4]) ).
thf(8,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h3]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h2,7,h3]) ).
thf(9,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h1,h2])],[h0,8,h1,h2]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[9,h0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU561^2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 01:01:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.38 % Mode: mode213
% 0.13/0.38 % Inferences: 98
% 0.13/0.38 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------