TSTP Solution File: SEU561^2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEU561^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:28:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 7 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 7 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 90 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 4 &; 60 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 4 ^ 21 !; 0 ?; 25 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
subsetI1: $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk1_2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_27,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(subset,axiom,
( subset
= ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset) ).
thf(subsetI1,axiom,
( subsetI1
<=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subsetI1) ).
thf(eqimpsubset1,conjecture,
( subsetI1
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eqimpsubset1) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
( subset
= ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ Z0 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ Z1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).
thf(c_0_4,axiom,
( subsetI1
= ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i] :
( ( in @ X3 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X3 @ X2 ) )
=> ! [X9: $i] :
( ( in @ X9 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X9 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[subsetI1,c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X10: $i,X11: $i] :
( ! [X12: $i] :
( ( in @ X12 @ X10 )
=> ( in @ X12 @ X11 ) )
=> ! [X13: $i] :
( ( in @ X13 @ X10 )
=> ( in @ X13 @ X11 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ! [X14: $i] :
( ( in @ X14 @ X1 )
=> ( in @ X14 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[eqimpsubset1]),c_0_3]),c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X15: $i,X16: $i,X18: $i] :
( ( ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X15 @ X16 ) @ X15 )
| ~ ( in @ X18 @ X15 )
| ( in @ X18 @ X16 ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ ( esk1_2 @ X15 @ X16 ) @ X16 )
| ~ ( in @ X18 @ X15 )
| ( in @ X18 @ X16 ) )
& ( esk2_0 = esk3_0 )
& ( in @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0 )
& ~ ( in @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( in @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
in @ esk4_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEU561^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 15:44:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # post_as_ho5 with pid 6501 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by post_as_ho5
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 6505 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 460
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 194
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------