TSTP Solution File: SEU536^2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU536^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:49:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU536^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 16:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.38 % (21429)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21434)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21430)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21435)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21433)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21432)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21431)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21434)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 $false),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f13])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true != (sK1 @ sK2))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ! [X2] : (($true = (sK1 @ X2)) | ($true != (in @ X2 @ sK0))) & (($true != (sK1 @ sK2)) & ((in @ sK2 @ sK0) = $true))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ? [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X0) != $true)) & ? [X3] : (($true != (X1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true))) => (! [X2] : (($true = (sK1 @ X2)) | ($true != (in @ X2 @ sK0))) & ? [X3] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ sK0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ? [X3] : (($true != (sK1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ sK0) = $true)) => (($true != (sK1 @ sK2)) & ((in @ sK2 @ sK0) = $true))),
% 0.15/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ? [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) | ((in @ X2 @ X0) != $true)) & ? [X3] : (($true != (X1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ? [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (! [X3] : (($true = (X1 @ X3)) | ((in @ X3 @ X0) != $true)) & ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~! [X1 : $i > $o,X0] : (~! [X2] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) => ((X1 @ X2) = $true)) => ? [X3] : (($true != (X1 @ X3)) & ((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~! [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (~! [X2] : (((in @ X2 @ X0) = $true) => ((X1 @ X2) = $true)) => ? [X3] : (((in @ X3 @ X0) = $true) & ~($true = (X1 @ X3))))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~! [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (~! [X2] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)) => ? [X3] : ((in @ X3 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X3)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38 ~! [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (~! [X2] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)) => ? [X2] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38 ! [X0,X1 : $i > $o] : (~! [X2] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) => (X1 @ X2)) => ? [X2] : ((in @ X2 @ X0) & ~(X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.15/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quantDeMorgan1)).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true = (sK1 @ sK2))),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f15])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ($true = (sK1 @ sK2)) | ($true != $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f14,f12])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ((in @ sK2 @ sK0) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.15/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38 ( ! [X2 : $i] : (($true != (in @ X2 @ sK0)) | ($true = (sK1 @ X2))) )),
% 0.15/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21427)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (21425)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------