TSTP Solution File: SEU527_8 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU527_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:27:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SEU527_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:31:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ceeictZMwL/E---3.1_8330.p
% 0.22/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # new_bool_3 with pid 8448 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8454 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_22, type, in: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_23, type, emptyset: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_24, type, setadjoin: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_25, type, emptysetE: $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_26, type, setadjoinE: $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_27, type, esk1_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_28, type, esk2_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_29, type, esk3_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_30, type, epred1_0: $o).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_31, type, esk4_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_32, type, esk5_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_33, type, esk6_0: $i).
% 0.22/0.51  tff(decl_34, type, epred2_0: $o).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(uniqinunit, conjecture, (emptysetE=>(setadjoinE=>![X1, X4]:((in(X1,setadjoin(X4,emptyset))=>X1=X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ceeictZMwL/E---3.1_8330.p', uniqinunit)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(setadjoinE, axiom, (setadjoinE<=>![X1, X3, X4]:((in(X4,setadjoin(X1,X3))=>![X2:$o]:(((X4=X1=>X2)=>((in(X4,X3)=>X2)=>X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ceeictZMwL/E---3.1_8330.p', setadjoinE)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(emptysetE, axiom, (emptysetE<=>![X1]:((in(X1,emptyset)=>![X2:$o]:(X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ceeictZMwL/E---3.1_8330.p', emptysetE)).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((emptysetE=>(setadjoinE=>![X1, X4]:((in(X1,setadjoin(X4,emptyset))=>X1=X4))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[uniqinunit])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X11, X12, X13, X14:$o]:(((((in(X13,X12)|X14|X13=X11|~in(X13,setadjoin(X11,X12))|~setadjoinE)&(~X14|X14|X13=X11|~in(X13,setadjoin(X11,X12))|~setadjoinE))&((in(X13,X12)|X14|~X14|~in(X13,setadjoin(X11,X12))|~setadjoinE)&(~X14|X14|~X14|~in(X13,setadjoin(X11,X12))|~setadjoinE)))&((in(esk6_0,setadjoin(esk4_0,esk5_0))|setadjoinE)&((esk6_0!=esk4_0|epred2_0|setadjoinE)&((~in(esk6_0,esk5_0)|epred2_0|setadjoinE)&(~epred2_0|setadjoinE)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[setadjoinE])])])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (emptysetE&(setadjoinE&(in(esk1_0,setadjoin(esk2_0,emptyset))&esk1_0!=esk2_0))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X7, X8:$o]:(((~emptysetE|(~in(X7,emptyset)|X8))&((in(esk3_0,emptyset)|emptysetE)&(~epred1_0|emptysetE)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[emptysetE])])])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_7, plain, (in(X1,X3)|X1=X4|~in(X1,setadjoin(X4,X3))|~setadjoinE), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (setadjoinE), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_9, plain, (~emptysetE|~in(X1,emptyset)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (emptysetE), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_11, plain, (X1=X3|in(X1,X4)|~in(X1,setadjoin(X3,X4))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (in(esk1_0,setadjoin(esk2_0,emptyset))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0!=esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_14, plain, (~in(X1,emptyset)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])).
% 0.22/0.51  cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13]), c_0_14]), ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.22/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 18
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.22/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.22/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.22/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.22/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 702
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------