TSTP Solution File: SEU504^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU504^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:49:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.35s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SEU504^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 16:19:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.31 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.09/0.31 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.33 % (17700)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17702)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17704)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17698)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17703)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17701)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17699)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17705)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17704)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.33 % (17704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (17704)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.34
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17704)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.34
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)Instructions burned: 29 (million)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17700)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17706)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17707)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17709)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.34
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.34 % (17708)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.15/0.35
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17707)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17703)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_1, type, exu: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_6, type, setadjoin: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_8, type, powerset: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_10, type, setunion: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_19, type, descr: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_21, type, dsetconstr: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_26, type, prop2set: $o > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_47, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_50, type, sK3: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_51, type, sK4: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_52, type, sK5: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_53, type, sK6: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_54, type, sK7: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_55, type, sK8: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_56, type, sK9: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_57, type, sK10: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_58, type, sK11: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_59, type, sK12: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_60, type, sK13: $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_61, type, sK14: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_63, type, sK15: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_64, type, sK16: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_65, type, sK17: $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_66, type, sK18: $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_67, type, sK19: $i > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_68, type, sK20: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_69, type, sK21: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(func_def_70, type, sK22: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f460,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 $false),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f142,f78])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f78,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true != (sK0 @ X1))) )),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f73,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 (powersetAx = $true) & (emptysetE = $true) & (dsetconstrI = $true) & (dsetconstrEL = $true) & (wellorderingAx = $true) & (replAx = $true) & (emptysetimpfalse = $true) & (omegaSAx = $true) & (prop2setE = $true) & (setunionAx = $true) & (foundationAx = $true) & (dsetconstrER = $true) & (setextAx = $true) & (descrp = $true) & (notinemptyset = $true) & (omegaIndAx = $true) & (emptysetAx = $true) & (exuE1 = $true) & (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) = $true) & ! [X1] : ($true != (sK0 @ X1))) & (setadjoinAx = $true) & (omega0Ax = $true)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f71,f72])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f72,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true)) => (((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) = $true) & ! [X1] : ($true != (sK0 @ X1)))),
% 0.15/0.35 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f71,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 (powersetAx = $true) & (emptysetE = $true) & (dsetconstrI = $true) & (dsetconstrEL = $true) & (wellorderingAx = $true) & (replAx = $true) & (emptysetimpfalse = $true) & (omegaSAx = $true) & (prop2setE = $true) & (setunionAx = $true) & (foundationAx = $true) & (dsetconstrER = $true) & (setextAx = $true) & (descrp = $true) & (notinemptyset = $true) & (omegaIndAx = $true) & (emptysetAx = $true) & (exuE1 = $true) & ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true)) & (setadjoinAx = $true) & (omega0Ax = $true)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(flattening,[],[f70])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f70,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 (((((((((((((((((((? [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) & ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true)) & (notinemptyset = $true)) & (emptysetimpfalse = $true)) & (emptysetE = $true)) & (prop2setE = $true)) & (exuE1 = $true)) & (dsetconstrER = $true)) & (dsetconstrEL = $true)) & (dsetconstrI = $true)) & (descrp = $true)) & (wellorderingAx = $true)) & (foundationAx = $true)) & (replAx = $true)) & (omegaIndAx = $true)) & (omegaSAx = $true)) & (omega0Ax = $true)) & (setunionAx = $true)) & (powersetAx = $true)) & (setadjoinAx = $true)) & (emptysetAx = $true)) & (setextAx = $true)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f69])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f69,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ~((setextAx = $true) => ((emptysetAx = $true) => ((setadjoinAx = $true) => ((powersetAx = $true) => ((setunionAx = $true) => ((omega0Ax = $true) => ((omegaSAx = $true) => ((omegaIndAx = $true) => ((replAx = $true) => ((foundationAx = $true) => ((wellorderingAx = $true) => ((descrp = $true) => ((dsetconstrI = $true) => ((dsetconstrEL = $true) => ((dsetconstrER = $true) => ((exuE1 = $true) => ((prop2setE = $true) => ((emptysetE = $true) => ((emptysetimpfalse = $true) => ((notinemptyset = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) => ? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true))))))))))))))))))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f64])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f64,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ~((setextAx = $true) => ((emptysetAx = $true) => ((setadjoinAx = $true) => ((powersetAx = $true) => ((setunionAx = $true) => ((omega0Ax = $true) => ((omegaSAx = $true) => ((omegaIndAx = $true) => ((replAx = $true) => ((foundationAx = $true) => ((wellorderingAx = $true) => ((descrp = $true) => ((dsetconstrI = $true) => ((dsetconstrEL = $true) => ((dsetconstrER = $true) => ((exuE1 = $true) => ((prop2setE = $true) => ((emptysetE = $true) => ((emptysetimpfalse = $true) => ((notinemptyset = $true) => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) => ? [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) = $true))))))))))))))))))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f63])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f63,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ~(setextAx => (emptysetAx => (setadjoinAx => (powersetAx => (setunionAx => (omega0Ax => (omegaSAx => (omegaIndAx => (replAx => (foundationAx => (wellorderingAx => (descrp => (dsetconstrI => (dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (exuE1 => (prop2setE => (emptysetE => (emptysetimpfalse => (notinemptyset => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X2] : (X0 @ X2))))))))))))))))))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f24])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f24,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.35 ~(setextAx => (emptysetAx => (setadjoinAx => (powersetAx => (setunionAx => (omega0Ax => (omegaSAx => (omegaIndAx => (replAx => (foundationAx => (wellorderingAx => (descrp => (dsetconstrI => (dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (exuE1 => (prop2setE => (emptysetE => (emptysetimpfalse => (notinemptyset => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X1] : (X0 @ X1))))))))))))))))))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f23])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f23,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.35 setextAx => (emptysetAx => (setadjoinAx => (powersetAx => (setunionAx => (omega0Ax => (omegaSAx => (omegaIndAx => (replAx => (foundationAx => (wellorderingAx => (descrp => (dsetconstrI => (dsetconstrEL => (dsetconstrER => (exuE1 => (prop2setE => (emptysetE => (emptysetimpfalse => (notinemptyset => ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((exu @ (^[X1 : $i] : (X0 @ X1))) => ? [X1] : (X0 @ X1)))))))))))))))))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',exuE3e)).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f142,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f141])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f141,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ($true = ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) => (sK2 = Y0)))) & (sK0 @ sK2)))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f140])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f140,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))) & (sK0 @ Y0))) @ sK2))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f139])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f139,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ($true = (?? @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y1) => (Y0 = Y1)))) & (sK0 @ Y0)))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f119])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f119,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))) & (Y0 @ Y1))))) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f79,f104])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f104,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))) & (Y0 @ Y1))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f40,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 (exu = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y1 = Y2)))) & (Y0 @ Y1))))))),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f39])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f39,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ((^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) & ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2))))) = exu)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.15/0.35 ((^[X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) & ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 = X2))))) = exu)),
% 0.15/0.35 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',exu)).
% 0.15/0.35 thf(f79,plain,(
% 0.15/0.35 ((exu @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 @ Y0))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.35 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73])).
% 0.15/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.35
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)Instructions burned: 44 (million)
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17698)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.35 % (17697)Success in time 0.03 s
% 0.15/0.35 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------