TSTP Solution File: SEU492^1 by Leo-III---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.12
% Problem  : SEU492^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:37:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 15.22s 4.59s
% Output   : Refutation 15.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   94 (  30 unt;  22 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  214 (  51 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  602 ( 123   ~;  58   |;  24   &; 362   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  35  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   49 (  49   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   26 (  23 usr;  19 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  123 (  23   ^ 100   !;   0   ?; 123   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(irrefl_type,type,
    irrefl: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(irrefl_def,definition,
    ( irrefl
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(trans_type,type,
    trans: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(trans_def,definition,
    ( trans
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
            & ( A @ C @ D ) )
         => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(so_type,type,
    so: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(so_def,definition,
    ( so
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ( asymm @ A )
          & ( trans @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(sk5_type,type,
    sk5: $i ).

thf(sk6_type,type,
    sk6: $i ).

thf(sk7_type,type,
    sk7: $i ).

thf(sk8_type,type,
    sk8: $i ).

thf(sk9_type,type,
    sk9: $i ).

thf(sk10_type,type,
    sk10: $i ).

thf(sk11_type,type,
    sk11: $i ).

thf(sk12_type,type,
    sk12: $i ).

thf(sk14_type,type,
    sk14: $i ).

thf(sk16_type,type,
    sk16: $i ).

thf(sk17_type,type,
    sk17: $i ).

thf(sk18_type,type,
    sk18: $i ).

thf(sk19_type,type,
    sk19: $i ).

thf(sk20_type,type,
    sk20: $i ).

thf(sk21_type,type,
    sk21: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( so
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ( irrefl @ A )
          & ( trans @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',alternative_definition_of_strict_order) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( so
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ( irrefl @ A )
          & ( trans @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ B @ C )
             => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ D ) )
             => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ~ ( A @ B @ B )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ D ) )
             => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ B @ C )
             => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ D ) )
             => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( ! [B: $i] :
              ~ ( A @ B @ B )
          & ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
                & ( A @ C @ D ) )
             => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ B @ C )
           => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) ) )
     != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) )
    | ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
              & ( A @ C @ D ) )
           => ( A @ B @ D ) ) )
     != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
          ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
              & ( A @ C @ D ) )
           => ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B @ C )
         => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i] :
        ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B @ C )
         => ~ ( A @ C @ B ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ B @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
         => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) ) )
   != ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
       => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[18]) ).

thf(176,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 )
      | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
       != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(179,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[176:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(184,plain,
    ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[179]) ).

thf(189,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
         => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) ) )
   != ~ $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[10,184]) ).

thf(190,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
       => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[189]) ).

thf(195,plain,
    sk3 @ sk21 @ sk4,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[190]) ).

thf(209,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk21 @ sk4 )
   != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[195,184]) ).

thf(210,plain,
    ( ( sk21 != sk4 )
    | ( sk4 != sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[209]) ).

thf(211,plain,
    sk21 != sk4,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[210]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( sk2 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) ) )
   != ( ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( sk2 @ A @ B )
       => ~ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) )
    | ! [A: $i] :
        ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ C @ C )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(123,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ C @ C )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A @ B )
      | ( ( sk2 @ B @ A )
       != ( sk2 @ C @ C ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(126,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[123:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(133,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[126]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
            & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
         => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) )
   != ( ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
            & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
         => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
           => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) ) )
     != ( ! [A: $i] :
            ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A ) ) )
    | ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
              & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
           => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) )
     != ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
              & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
           => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) ) )
   != ( ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ( ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
    | ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk20 @ sk20 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[67]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk20 @ sk20 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[69]) ).

thf(109,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 )
    | ( sk20 != sk19 )
    | ( sk20 != sk18 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( sk2 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) )
    | ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk7 @ sk7 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).

thf(135,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[14,133]) ).

thf(136,plain,
    sk2 @ sk6 @ sk5,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[135]) ).

thf(139,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk2 @ sk6 @ sk5 )
     != ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[136,133]) ).

thf(145,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk6 != A )
      | ( sk5 != A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[139]) ).

thf(148,plain,
    sk6 != sk5,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[145]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
         => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) )
    | ~ ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk8 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(193,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( sk3 @ sk8 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[19,184]) ).

thf(194,plain,
    sk3 @ sk8 @ sk4,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[193]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( sk2 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk2 @ B @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk2 @ A @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ( ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
           => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
              & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
           => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) )
    | ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
            ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A )
        & ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
            ( ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
              & ( sk1 @ B @ C ) )
           => ( sk1 @ A @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk14 @ sk14 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk16 @ sk17 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk9 @ sk10 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk11 @ sk12 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[37]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk7 @ sk7 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk5 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).

thf(137,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( sk2 @ sk5 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[15,133]) ).

thf(138,plain,
    sk2 @ sk5 @ sk6,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[137]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk8 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk8 != sk4 )
    | ( sk4 != sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk8 != sk4 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ( ( sk8 != sk4 )
    | ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
       => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,10]) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ( ( sk8 != sk4 )
    | ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
       => ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[72:[]]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 )
      | ( sk8 != sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[73]) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk8 != sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ A @ sk4 )
      | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,74]) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ( ( sk8 != sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[86:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ( ( sk8 != sk4 )
    | ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,87]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    sk8 != sk4,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[100:[]]) ).

thf(196,plain,
    sk3 @ sk4 @ sk21,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[190]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk20 @ sk20 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk18 @ sk19 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[67]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk8 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(191,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( sk3 @ sk4 @ sk8 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[20,184]) ).

thf(192,plain,
    sk3 @ sk4 @ sk8,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[191]) ).

thf(163,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk18 @ sk19 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk20 @ sk20 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk18 @ sk19 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

thf(165,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk18 @ sk19 )
    | ( sk20 != sk18 )
    | ( sk20 != sk19 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[163]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A @ B )
         => ~ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ~ ( sk1 @ A @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk20 @ sk20 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk19 @ sk18 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

thf(254,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[211,133,6,9,109,148,3,194,16,11,40,8,69,138,101,184,196,70,192,165,7,39,66,108,4,136,195]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11  % Problem  : SEU492^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.05/0.14  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 19 17:15:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.83/0.84  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (172ms). 
% 1.21/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.77/1.29  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.77/1.29  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.77/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.10/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.10/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.10/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.10/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.10/1.48  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 15.22/4.58  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 15.22/4.58  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 15.22/4.59  % Time passed: 4103ms (effective reasoning time: 3556ms)
% 15.22/4.59  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 15.22/4.59  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 15.22/4.59  % No. of inferences in proof: 69
% 15.22/4.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 4103 ms resp. 3556 ms w/o parsing
% 15.22/4.64  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 15.22/4.64  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------