TSTP Solution File: SEU446+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : SEU446+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:04:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 210.04s 206.45s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU446+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:09:19 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 17.60/17.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 17.60/17.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 17.60/17.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.41/34.05 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.41/34.05 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.41/34.05 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.15/51.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.15/51.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.15/51.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 76.74/75.80 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.74/75.80 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.74/75.80 Peak sizes were: global stack 129560 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.38/92.89 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.38/92.89 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.38/92.89 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 112.13/110.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 112.13/110.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 112.13/110.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 146.50/144.18 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 146.50/144.18 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 146.50/144.18 Peak sizes were: global stack 129560 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 210.01/205.50 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 210.01/205.50 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 210.01/205.50 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 210.04/206.45 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------