TSTP Solution File: SEU446+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU446+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 152.25s 27.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 152.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 11 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_365,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))
| ~ m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_365) ).
cnf(i_0_2085,plain,
( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_2085) ).
cnf(i_0_6692,plain,
( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X2,k9_relset_2(X2,X1,X2,X3,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3)),X2)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_6692) ).
cnf(i_0_2079,plain,
( k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k4_relat_1(X3)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_2079) ).
cnf(i_0_5677,plain,
( v1_relat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_5677) ).
cnf(i_0_1213,plain,
v1_relat_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_1213) ).
cnf(i_0_6727,negated_conjecture,
k10_relset_1(esk1009_0,esk1009_0,k9_relset_2(esk1009_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0,k6_relset_1(esk1008_0,esk1009_0,esk1010_0),esk1010_0),esk1009_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1008_0,esk1009_0,esk1010_0,esk1008_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_6727) ).
cnf(i_0_1707,plain,
( k4_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_1707) ).
cnf(i_0_6728,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk1010_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_6728) ).
cnf(i_0_991,plain,
( m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X1)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bbpcdj7a/input.p',i_0_991) ).
cnf(c_0_6739,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))
| ~ m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_365 ).
cnf(c_0_6740,plain,
( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_2085 ).
cnf(c_0_6741,plain,
( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X2,k9_relset_2(X2,X1,X2,X3,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3)),X2)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1) ),
i_0_6692 ).
cnf(c_0_6742,plain,
( k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k4_relat_1(X3)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_2079 ).
cnf(c_0_6743,plain,
( v1_relat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
i_0_5677 ).
cnf(c_0_6744,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6739,c_0_6740]) ).
cnf(c_0_6745,plain,
v1_relat_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)),
i_0_1213 ).
cnf(c_0_6746,negated_conjecture,
k10_relset_1(esk1009_0,esk1009_0,k9_relset_2(esk1009_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0,k6_relset_1(esk1008_0,esk1009_0,esk1010_0),esk1010_0),esk1009_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1008_0,esk1009_0,esk1010_0,esk1008_0),
i_0_6727 ).
cnf(c_0_6747,plain,
( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k4_relat_1(X3),X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X2,k9_relset_2(X2,X1,X2,X3,k4_relat_1(X3)),X2)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6741,c_0_6742]),c_0_6740]) ).
cnf(c_0_6748,plain,
( k4_relat_1(k4_relat_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
i_0_1707 ).
cnf(c_0_6749,plain,
( v1_relat_1(X1)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6743,c_0_6744]),c_0_6745])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6750,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk1010_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0),
i_0_6728 ).
cnf(c_0_6751,plain,
( m2_relset_1(k6_relset_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X1)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_991 ).
cnf(c_0_6752,negated_conjecture,
( k10_relset_1(esk1009_0,esk1009_0,k9_relset_2(esk1009_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0,k4_relat_1(esk1010_0),esk1010_0),esk1009_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1008_0,esk1009_0,esk1010_0,esk1008_0)
| ~ m1_relset_1(esk1010_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6746,c_0_6742]) ).
cnf(c_0_6753,plain,
( k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X3,X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X2,k9_relset_2(X2,X1,X2,k4_relat_1(X3),X3),X2)
| ~ m2_relset_1(k4_relat_1(X3),X2,X1)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6747,c_0_6748]) ).
cnf(c_0_6754,negated_conjecture,
v1_relat_1(esk1010_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6749,c_0_6750]) ).
cnf(c_0_6755,plain,
( m2_relset_1(k4_relat_1(X1),X2,X3)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6751,c_0_6742]) ).
cnf(c_0_6756,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_relset_1(esk1010_0,esk1008_0,esk1009_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6752,c_0_6753]),c_0_6754])]),c_0_6755]) ).
cnf(c_0_6757,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6756,c_0_6740]),c_0_6750])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU446+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 15:21:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 2.93/3.17 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.93/3.17 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 2.93/3.17 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 2.93/3.17 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 152.25/27.16 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15+lgb-t150-d45-l8000-e0.15+coop-mzr02:
% 152.25/27.16 # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15/lgb-t150-d45-l8000-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 38; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 152.25/27.16 # Preprocessing time : 12.504 s
% 152.25/27.16
% 152.25/27.16 # Proof found!
% 152.25/27.16 # SZS status Theorem
% 152.25/27.16 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 152.25/27.16 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 152.25/27.16
% 152.25/27.16 # -------------------------------------------------
% 152.25/27.16 # User time : 16.524 s
% 152.25/27.16 # System time : 0.229 s
% 152.25/27.16 # Total time : 16.753 s
% 152.25/27.16 # ...preprocessing : 12.504 s
% 152.25/27.16 # ...main loop : 4.249 s
% 152.25/27.16 # Maximum resident set size: 206260 pages
% 152.25/27.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------