TSTP Solution File: SEU444+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU444+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:32:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.14s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  10   ~;   6   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t56_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
     => ( k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1)
        & k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k2_funct_5(X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cGsUFywAAN/E---3.1_26159.p',t56_relset_2) ).

fof(t51_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
     => ( k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1)
        & k2_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cGsUFywAAN/E---3.1_26159.p',t51_relset_2) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m2_relset_1(X3,X2,X1)
       => ( k1_funct_5(X3) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),X1)
          & k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k10_relset_1(X2,X1,X3,X2)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,k6_relset_1(X2,X1,X3),k2_funct_5(X3)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t56_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( m2_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & ( k1_funct_5(esk3_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
      | k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k10_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k2_funct_5(esk3_0)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X100,X101,X102] :
      ( ( k1_funct_5(X102) = k10_relset_1(X100,X101,k6_relset_1(X101,X100,X102),X100)
        | ~ m2_relset_1(X102,X101,X100) )
      & ( k2_funct_5(X102) = k10_relset_1(X101,X100,X102,X101)
        | ~ m2_relset_1(X102,X101,X100) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t51_relset_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( k1_funct_5(esk3_0) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k10_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)) != k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),k2_funct_5(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( k2_funct_5(X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk3_0,esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    k10_relset_1(esk1_0,esk2_0,k6_relset_1(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),esk1_0) != k1_funct_5(esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( k1_funct_5(X1) = k10_relset_1(X2,X3,k6_relset_1(X3,X2,X1),X2)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : SEU444+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 08:57:31 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.57/0.76  Running first-order model finding
% 0.57/0.76  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cGsUFywAAN/E---3.1_26159.p
% 6.14/1.64  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 6.14/1.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.14/1.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with pid 26239 completed with status 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p
% 6.14/1.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.14/1.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
% 6.14/1.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.14/1.64  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 26240 completed with status 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 6.14/1.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.14/1.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
% 6.14/1.64  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.14/1.64  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 6.14/1.64  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 6.14/1.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.030 s
% 6.14/1.64  
% 6.14/1.64  # Proof found!
% 6.14/1.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.14/1.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.14/1.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 4528
% 6.14/1.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4027
% 6.14/1.64  # Initial clauses                      : 860
% 6.14/1.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 31
% 6.14/1.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 829
% 6.14/1.64  # Processed clauses                    : 860
% 6.14/1.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 19
% 6.14/1.64  # ...subsumed                          : 45
% 6.14/1.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 796
% 6.14/1.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 88
% 6.14/1.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 6.14/1.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 6.14/1.64  # Generated clauses                    : 21087
% 6.14/1.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19623
% 6.14/1.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
% 6.14/1.64  # Paramodulations                      : 20931
% 6.14/1.64  # Factorizations                       : 34
% 6.14/1.64  # NegExts                              : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 123
% 6.14/1.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 17211
% 6.14/1.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.14/1.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 767
% 6.14/1.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 106
% 6.14/1.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 6.14/1.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 6.14/1.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 638
% 6.14/1.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19584
% 6.14/1.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 70647
% 6.14/1.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 6.14/1.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 93176
% 6.14/1.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34277
% 6.14/1.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 52
% 6.14/1.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3175
% 6.14/1.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 247
% 6.14/1.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 66
% 6.14/1.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.14/1.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 559788
% 6.14/1.64  
% 6.14/1.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.14/1.64  # User time                : 0.694 s
% 6.14/1.64  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 6.14/1.64  # Total time               : 0.733 s
% 6.14/1.64  # Maximum resident set size: 9896 pages
% 6.14/1.64  
% 6.14/1.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.14/1.64  # User time                : 0.816 s
% 6.14/1.64  # System time              : 0.045 s
% 6.14/1.64  # Total time               : 0.860 s
% 6.14/1.64  # Maximum resident set size: 7220 pages
% 6.14/1.64  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------