TSTP Solution File: SEU435+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU435+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:20:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.22s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-6 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t36_relset_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))))
=> ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X5))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t36_relset_2) ).
fof(s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))))
& m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) )
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))))
=> ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X5))) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t36_relset_2]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))))
& m1_subset_1(esk6_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk4_0))
& ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk5_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(X9,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X7,X8))))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X12,k1_zfmisc_1(X10))
| m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X11))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk5_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X5)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk6_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SEU435+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 15:44:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.22/2.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.22/2.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.22/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.715 s
% 1.22/2.40
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof found!
% 1.22/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.22/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 1.22/2.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 1.22/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.22/2.40 # Parsed axioms : 19109
% 1.22/2.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 19008
% 1.22/2.40 # Initial clauses : 172
% 1.22/2.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 1.22/2.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 166
% 1.22/2.40 # Processed clauses : 113
% 1.22/2.40 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 1.22/2.40 # ...subsumed : 5
% 1.22/2.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 104
% 1.22/2.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 1.22/2.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 1.22/2.40 # Generated clauses : 256
% 1.22/2.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 206
% 1.22/2.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 1.22/2.40 # Paramodulations : 249
% 1.22/2.40 # Factorizations : 2
% 1.22/2.40 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 1.22/2.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 1.22/2.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 1.22/2.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.22/2.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 73
% 1.22/2.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 259
% 1.22/2.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 849
% 1.22/2.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 1.22/2.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 791
% 1.22/2.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 601
% 1.22/2.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 1.22/2.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 1.22/2.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.22/2.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.22/2.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.22/2.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 558043
% 1.22/2.40
% 1.22/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.22/2.40 # User time : 0.693 s
% 1.22/2.40 # System time : 0.027 s
% 1.22/2.40 # Total time : 0.720 s
% 1.22/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 46048 pages
% 1.26/24.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/24.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.26/24.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.26/24.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------