TSTP Solution File: SEU435+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:52:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 18:51:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.50  Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.50  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.19/0.50    fof(s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2, axiom, ![B, C, D, E, F, A2]: ((m1_subset_1(C, k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(A2, B)))) & m1_subset_1(F, k1_zfmisc_1(D))) => m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(A2, B, C, D, E, F), k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(E))))).
% 0.19/0.51    fof(t36_relset_2, conjecture, ![A, B2, C2]: (m1_subset_1(C2, k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(A, B2)))) => ![D2, E2, F2]: (m1_subset_1(F2, k1_zfmisc_1(D2)) => m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(A, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2), k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(E2)))))).
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.19/0.51  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.19/0.51  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.19/0.51    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.19/0.51    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.19/0.51  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.19/0.51  variables of u and v.
% 0.19/0.51  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.19/0.51  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  Axiom 1 (t36_relset_2_1): m1_subset_1(f, k1_zfmisc_1(d)) = true2.
% 0.19/0.51  Axiom 2 (t36_relset_2): m1_subset_1(c5, k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(a4, b5)))) = true2.
% 0.19/0.51  Axiom 3 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2): fresh12(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U, T) = true2.
% 0.19/0.51  Axiom 4 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2): fresh13(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U, T) = m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(Y, Z, W, V, U, T), k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(U))).
% 0.19/0.51  Axiom 5 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2): fresh13(m1_subset_1(X, k1_zfmisc_1(Y)), true2, Z, W, V, Y, U, X) = fresh12(m1_subset_1(V, k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(Z, W)))), true2, Z, W, V, Y, U, X).
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  Goal 1 (t36_relset_2_2): m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(a4, b5, c5, d, e, f), k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(e))) = true2.
% 0.19/0.51  Proof:
% 0.19/0.51    m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(a4, b5, c5, d, e, f), k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(e)))
% 0.19/0.51  = { by axiom 4 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) R->L }
% 0.19/0.51    fresh13(true2, true2, a4, b5, c5, d, e, f)
% 0.19/0.51  = { by axiom 1 (t36_relset_2_1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.51    fresh13(m1_subset_1(f, k1_zfmisc_1(d)), true2, a4, b5, c5, d, e, f)
% 0.19/0.51  = { by axiom 5 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) }
% 0.19/0.51    fresh12(m1_subset_1(c5, k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(a4, b5)))), true2, a4, b5, c5, d, e, f)
% 0.19/0.51  = { by axiom 2 (t36_relset_2) }
% 0.19/0.51    fresh12(true2, true2, a4, b5, c5, d, e, f)
% 0.19/0.51  = { by axiom 3 (s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) }
% 0.19/0.51    true2
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------