TSTP Solution File: SEU435+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:58:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.84s 3.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   44
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (   4 unt;  42 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   6   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   73 (  32   >;  41   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   31 (  31 usr;  10 con; 0-7 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ v1_funct_2 > m2_relset_1 > m1_relset_1 > r2_hidden > r1_tarski > m1_subset_1 > m1_eqrel_1 > v3_relat_1 > v1_xboole_0 > v1_relat_1 > v1_funct_1 > a_6_0_relset_2 > k8_relset_2 > k7_relset_2 > k4_relset_2 > k6_relset_2 > k9_relat_1 > k8_setfam_1 > k5_relset_2 > k2_zfmisc_1 > #nlpp > k3_pua2mss1 > k1_zfmisc_1 > k1_xboole_0 > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_16 > #skF_17 > #skF_15 > #skF_14 > #skF_11 > #skF_18 > #skF_5 > #skF_19 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_10 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_13 > #skF_4 > #skF_12

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff(m2_relset_1,type,
    m2_relset_1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i > $i ).

tff(v1_funct_1,type,
    v1_funct_1: $i > $o ).

tff(k4_relset_2,type,
    k4_relset_2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i ).

tff(m1_eqrel_1,type,
    m1_eqrel_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(r2_hidden,type,
    r2_hidden: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff(k1_xboole_0,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

tff(k8_setfam_1,type,
    k8_setfam_1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v3_relat_1,type,
    v3_relat_1: $i > $o ).

tff(r1_tarski,type,
    r1_tarski: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(m1_relset_1,type,
    m1_relset_1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(k8_relset_2,type,
    k8_relset_2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(k6_relset_2,type,
    k6_relset_2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v1_funct_2,type,
    v1_funct_2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff(k9_relat_1,type,
    k9_relat_1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(k1_zfmisc_1,type,
    k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff(v1_relat_1,type,
    v1_relat_1: $i > $o ).

tff(k2_zfmisc_1,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(a_6_0_relset_2,type,
    a_6_0_relset_2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(k3_pua2mss1,type,
    k3_pua2mss1: $i > $i ).

tff(v1_xboole_0,type,
    v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).

tff(k5_relset_2,type,
    k5_relset_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(k7_relset_2,type,
    k7_relset_2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(m1_subset_1,type,
    m1_subset_1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(A,B))))
       => ! [D,E,F] :
            ( m1_subset_1(F,k1_zfmisc_1(D))
           => m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(A,B,C,D,E,F),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(E))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_relset_2) ).

tff(f_203,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D,E,F] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(A,B))))
        & m1_subset_1(F,k1_zfmisc_1(D)) )
     => m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(A,B,C,D,E,F),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(E))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    m1_subset_1('#skF_3',k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1('#skF_1','#skF_2')))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    m1_subset_1('#skF_6',k1_zfmisc_1('#skF_4')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_8898,plain,
    ! [E_997,F_994,C_992,A_993,B_995,D_996] :
      ( m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(A_993,B_995,C_992,D_996,E_997,F_994),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(E_997)))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(F_994,k1_zfmisc_1(D_996))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(C_992,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(A_993,B_995)))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_203]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_3','#skF_4','#skF_5','#skF_6'),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1('#skF_5'))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_8912,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1('#skF_6',k1_zfmisc_1('#skF_4'))
    | ~ m1_subset_1('#skF_3',k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1('#skF_1','#skF_2')))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8898,c_2]) ).

tff(c_8923,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_4,c_8912]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:50:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.84/3.56  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.84/3.56  
% 10.84/3.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.84/3.59  
% 10.84/3.59  Inference rules
% 10.84/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.84/3.59  #Ref     : 0
% 10.84/3.59  #Sup     : 1959
% 10.84/3.59  #Fact    : 0
% 10.84/3.59  #Define  : 0
% 10.84/3.59  #Split   : 26
% 10.84/3.59  #Chain   : 0
% 10.84/3.59  #Close   : 0
% 10.84/3.59  
% 10.84/3.59  Ordering : KBO
% 10.84/3.59  
% 10.84/3.59  Simplification rules
% 10.84/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.84/3.59  #Subsume      : 320
% 10.84/3.59  #Demod        : 398
% 10.84/3.59  #Tautology    : 375
% 10.84/3.59  #SimpNegUnit  : 124
% 10.84/3.59  #BackRed      : 80
% 10.84/3.59  
% 10.84/3.59  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 10.84/3.59  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 10.84/3.59  
% 10.84/3.59  Timing (in seconds)
% 10.84/3.59  ----------------------
% 10.84/3.59  Preprocessing        : 0.64
% 10.84/3.59  Parsing              : 0.32
% 10.84/3.59  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 10.84/3.59  Main loop            : 1.90
% 10.84/3.59  Inferencing          : 0.74
% 10.84/3.59  Reduction            : 0.57
% 10.84/3.59  Demodulation         : 0.37
% 10.84/3.59  BG Simplification    : 0.06
% 10.84/3.59  Subsumption          : 0.38
% 10.84/3.59  Abstraction          : 0.07
% 10.84/3.59  MUC search           : 0.00
% 10.84/3.59  Cooper               : 0.00
% 10.84/3.59  Total                : 2.58
% 10.84/3.59  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 10.84/3.59  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 10.84/3.59  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 10.84/3.59  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------