TSTP Solution File: SEU430+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SEU430+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:26:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU430+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:47:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.20/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.20/0.37  #
% 0.20/0.37  # Number of axioms: 43 Number of unprocessed: 43
% 0.20/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.20/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.20/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.37  # 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.37  # Found 17 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.20/0.37  # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.37  # 26 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.37  # 17 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.20/0.37  # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.37  # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.42  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.42  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (v1_xboole_0(esk9_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (v1_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (v1_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk9_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk11_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (v1_relat_1(esk13_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (v3_relat_1(k1_xboole_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (v3_relat_1(esk13_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(esk11_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (X1=k1_xboole_0|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (v1_xboole_0(esk12_1(X1)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (v1_relat_1(X1)|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (r1_tarski(X1,X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (X1=X2|~v1_xboole_0(X2)|~v1_xboole_0(X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (esk3_0!=k1_xboole_0|k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=k1_xboole_0)).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (m1_subset_1(esk8_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X1)|~v1_xboole_0(esk10_1(X1)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=k1_xboole_0|r2_hidden(esk4_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1!=k1_xboole_0|~r2_hidden(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (m1_subset_1(esk12_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)|k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=k1_xboole_0)).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(X2)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X1)|m1_subset_1(esk10_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (X1=k1_xboole_0|k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)=k1_xboole_0|~r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,X2)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (v1_xboole_0(X2)|r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~r1_tarski(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (~r2_hidden(X2,X1)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (r1_tarski(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(X3)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (r2_hidden(X1,X4)|X4!=k3_tarski(X3)|~r2_hidden(X2,X3)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (m1_subset_1(X1,X3)|~r2_hidden(X1,X2)|~m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (k5_setfam_1(X2,X1)=k3_tarski(X1)|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2))))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X2=k3_tarski(X1)|r2_hidden(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)|r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (m1_subset_1(k5_setfam_1(X2,X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))|~m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2))))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X2=k3_tarski(X1)|r2_hidden(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)|r2_hidden(esk6_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2)))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (r2_hidden(X1,esk5_3(X2,X3,X1))|X3!=k3_tarski(X2)|~r2_hidden(X1,X3))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (r2_hidden(esk5_3(X1,X2,X3),X1)|X2!=k3_tarski(X1)|~r2_hidden(X3,X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X2=k3_tarski(X1)|~r2_hidden(X3,X1)|~r2_hidden(esk6_2(X1,X2),X3)|~r2_hidden(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.20/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.42  # Found 5 steps
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)|k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=k1_xboole_0), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_197, plain, (esk2_0!=k1_xboole_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=k1_xboole_0), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_52, ...])).
% 0.20/0.42  cnf(i_0_200, plain, (~v1_xboole_0(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_200, ...])).
% 0.20/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.42  # Child (18351) has found a proof.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.42  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------