TSTP Solution File: SEU430+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU430+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:20:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 51 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 141 ( 53 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 147 ( 57 ~; 61 |; 16 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 71 ( 11 sgn 39 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t30_relset_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
=> ( k5_setfam_1(X1,X2) = k1_xboole_0
<=> ! [X3] :
( r2_hidden(X3,X2)
=> X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t30_relset_2) ).
fof(t6_boole,axiom,
! [X1] :
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t6_boole) ).
fof(rc2_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
& v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rc2_subset_1) ).
fof(redefinition_k5_setfam_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
=> k5_setfam_1(X1,X2) = k3_tarski(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',redefinition_k5_setfam_1) ).
fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X2 = k3_tarski(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( r2_hidden(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( r2_hidden(X3,X4)
& r2_hidden(X4,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_tarski) ).
fof(t5_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
~ ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
& v1_xboole_0(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t5_subset) ).
fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
<=> ! [X2] : ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_xboole_0) ).
fof(fc12_relat_1,axiom,
( v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0)
& v1_relat_1(k1_xboole_0)
& v3_relat_1(k1_xboole_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc12_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
=> ( k5_setfam_1(X1,X2) = k1_xboole_0
<=> ! [X3] :
( r2_hidden(X3,X2)
=> X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t30_relset_2]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| X2 = k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(esk12_1(X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
& v1_xboole_0(esk12_1(X3)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc2_subset_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X7] :
( m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))
& ( r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0 )
& ( esk3_0 != k1_xboole_0
| k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0 )
& ( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X7,esk2_0)
| X7 = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))
| k5_setfam_1(X3,X4) = k3_tarski(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k5_setfam_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk12_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X5,X6,X11] :
( ( r2_hidden(X7,esk5_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ r2_hidden(X7,X6)
| X6 != k3_tarski(X5) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk5_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ r2_hidden(X7,X6)
| X6 != k3_tarski(X5) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(X7,X9)
| ~ r2_hidden(X9,X5)
| r2_hidden(X7,X6)
| X6 != k3_tarski(X5) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk6_2(X5,X6),X11)
| ~ r2_hidden(X11,X5)
| X6 = k3_tarski(X5) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6))
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = k3_tarski(X5) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk7_2(X5,X6),X5)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = k3_tarski(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( k5_setfam_1(X1,X2) = k3_tarski(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X4,X5)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X6))
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
m1_subset_1(esk12_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
esk12_1(X1) = k1_xboole_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ epred1_0
<=> ! [X1] : ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = k3_tarski(X2)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(X2,X1),X1)
| r2_hidden(esk7_2(X2,X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( r2_hidden(X3,X1)
| X1 != k3_tarski(X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X4,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| k3_tarski(esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3] :
( ( X3 != k1_xboole_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk4_1(X3),X3)
| X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0
| esk3_0 != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ epred2_0
<=> ! [X2] : ~ r2_hidden(X2,k1_xboole_0) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( epred1_0
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fc12_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( X1 = k3_tarski(X2)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(X2,X1),X1)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(X2,X1),esk7_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| esk7_2(esk2_0,X1) = k1_xboole_0
| X1 = k3_tarski(esk2_0)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| k3_tarski(esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0
| X2 != k3_tarski(esk2_0)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk4_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( k3_tarski(esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0
| esk3_0 != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_22]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
epred1_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| X2 != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| X1 = k3_tarski(esk2_0)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,X1),k1_xboole_0)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( epred2_0
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,k1_xboole_0) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(esk4_1(esk3_0),X1)
| k3_tarski(esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0
| X1 != k3_tarski(esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
~ epred2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| X1 = k3_tarski(esk2_0)
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,X1),k1_xboole_0)
| X1 != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
k3_tarski(esk2_0) != k1_xboole_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( k5_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,k1_xboole_0),k1_xboole_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]),c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(esk6_2(esk2_0,k1_xboole_0),k1_xboole_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_48]),c_0_18])]),c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_49]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU430+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:47:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 51
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 33
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 18
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 18
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 15
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 17
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 372
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 124
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 240
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 32
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 21
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 1131
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1023
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 43
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 1110
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 177
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 141
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 574
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 2518
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 61
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3313
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2291
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 125
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 521
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 16130
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.047 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.048 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3968 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------