TSTP Solution File: SEU429+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 03:53:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 69 ( 27 ~; 12 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 26 !; 16 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f140,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f139,f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
fof(f77,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
& m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1)
& m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0)))
& ~ v1_xboole_0(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f53,f76,f75,f74]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0))) )
& ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) )
=> ( ? [X2,X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,X1) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) )
& ~ v1_xboole_0(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
( ? [X2,X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,X1) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,sK1) )
& m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,sK1) )
=> ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
& m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
& m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0))) )
& ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X0)
=> ! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
=> ! [X3] :
( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
=> m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X0)
=> ! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
=> ! [X3] :
( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
=> m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57F5gNj4yT/Vampire---4.8_12158',t28_relset_2) ).
fof(f139,plain,
~ m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))),
inference(resolution,[],[f138,f96]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
! [X0] :
( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,X0,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f133,f93]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
fof(f133,plain,
! [X0] :
( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,X0,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0)))
| v1_xboole_0(sK0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f95,f102]) ).
fof(f102,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
| m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
| v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
| ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
| v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
| ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
| v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
& ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) )
=> m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57F5gNj4yT/Vampire---4.8_12158',s8_domain_1__e1_38__relset_2) ).
fof(f95,plain,
m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:36:50 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.10/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.57F5gNj4yT/Vampire---4.8_12158
% 0.60/0.79 % (12268)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12269)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12266)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12270)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12271)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12267)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12272)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.79 % (12271)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.79 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.79
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Memory used [KB]: 1063
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.79 % (12273)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.79 % (12265)Success in time 0.478 s
% 0.60/0.79 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------