TSTP Solution File: SEU429+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.46s 2.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   2 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_62,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p3lbn4wg/lgb.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p3lbn4wg/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p3lbn4wg/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p3lbn4wg/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p3lbn4wg/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk1_0),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    ( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(esk1_0,X1,esk3_0,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X2,esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]),c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0))),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_73]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:24:50 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.46/2.35  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.46/2.35  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.46/2.35  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.46/2.35  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S02CA
% 7.46/2.35  # and selection function SelectAntiRROptimalLit.
% 7.46/2.35  #
% 7.46/2.35  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.46/2.35  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.46/2.35  
% 7.46/2.35  # Proof found!
% 7.46/2.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.46/2.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.46/2.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.46/2.35  
% 7.46/2.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.46/2.35  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 7.46/2.35  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 7.46/2.35  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.46/2.35  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.46/2.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------