TSTP Solution File: SEU427+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU427+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.68s 3.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 19 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2187,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,k3_subset_1(X1,X2)) = X1
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2187) ).
cnf(i_0_2095,plain,
k3_subset_1(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2095) ).
cnf(i_0_614,plain,
m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_614) ).
cnf(i_0_2116,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X2),X3,k6_relset_2(X3,X2,X4),k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_relat_1(X1))) != k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2116) ).
cnf(i_0_2215,negated_conjecture,
k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0),esk347_0,k6_relset_2(esk347_0,esk346_0,esk350_0),k8_eqrel_1(esk348_0,k6_relat_1(esk348_0))) = k1_xboole_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2215) ).
cnf(i_0_2216,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk350_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk346_0,esk347_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2216) ).
cnf(i_0_2218,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk348_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2218) ).
cnf(i_0_1174,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X2,X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_1174) ).
cnf(i_0_624,plain,
m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_624) ).
cnf(i_0_2214,negated_conjecture,
k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,k4_subset_1(esk346_0,esk348_0,esk349_0),esk350_0) != k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,esk349_0,esk350_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2214) ).
cnf(i_0_2217,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk349_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mpcsq3dp/lgb.p',i_0_2217) ).
cnf(c_0_2230,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,k3_subset_1(X1,X2)) = X1
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
i_0_2187 ).
cnf(c_0_2231,plain,
k3_subset_1(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
i_0_2095 ).
cnf(c_0_2232,plain,
m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
i_0_614 ).
cnf(c_0_2233,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X2),X3,k6_relset_2(X3,X2,X4),k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_relat_1(X1))) != k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_2116 ).
cnf(c_0_2234,negated_conjecture,
k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0),esk347_0,k6_relset_2(esk347_0,esk346_0,esk350_0),k8_eqrel_1(esk348_0,k6_relat_1(esk348_0))) = k1_xboole_0,
i_0_2215 ).
cnf(c_0_2235,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk350_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk346_0,esk347_0))),
i_0_2216 ).
cnf(c_0_2236,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk348_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0)),
i_0_2218 ).
cnf(c_0_2237,plain,
k4_subset_1(X1,k1_xboole_0,X1) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2230,c_0_2231]),c_0_2232])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2238,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X2,X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
i_0_1174 ).
cnf(c_0_2239,plain,
m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
i_0_624 ).
cnf(c_0_2240,negated_conjecture,
k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,k4_subset_1(esk346_0,esk348_0,esk349_0),esk350_0) != k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,esk349_0,esk350_0),
i_0_2214 ).
cnf(c_0_2241,negated_conjecture,
esk348_0 = k1_xboole_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2233,c_0_2234]),c_0_2235]),c_0_2236])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2242,plain,
k3_tarski(k2_tarski(k1_xboole_0,X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2237,c_0_2238]),c_0_2239]),c_0_2232])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2243,negated_conjecture,
k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,k4_subset_1(esk346_0,k1_xboole_0,esk349_0),esk350_0) != k8_relset_2(esk346_0,esk347_0,esk349_0,esk350_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2240,c_0_2241]) ).
cnf(c_0_2244,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,k1_xboole_0,X2) = X2
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2238,c_0_2242]),c_0_2232])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2245,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk349_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk346_0)),
i_0_2217 ).
cnf(c_0_2246,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2243,c_0_2244]),c_0_2245])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU427+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:17:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.68/3.66 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.68/3.66 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.68/3.66 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.68/3.66 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.68/3.66 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.68/3.66 #
% 9.68/3.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 9.68/3.66 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.68/3.66
% 9.68/3.66 # Proof found!
% 9.68/3.66 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.68/3.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.68/3.66 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.68/3.66
% 9.68/3.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.68/3.66 # User time : 0.027 s
% 9.68/3.66 # System time : 0.005 s
% 9.68/3.66 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 9.68/3.66 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 9.68/3.66
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------