TSTP Solution File: SEU425+1 by ePrincess---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem : SEU425+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:49:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 240.73s 175.59s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU425+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:50:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.61 ____ _
% 0.42/0.61 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________
% 0.42/0.61 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.42/0.61 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ )
% 0.42/0.61 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.42/0.61 (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.42/0.61 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.42/0.61 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.42/0.61 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.42/0.61 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.42/0.61
% 0.42/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.69/0.66 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.58/0.97 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.26 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.68/1.28 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.92/5.95 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.08/6.01 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 20.94/6.15 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 20.94/6.16 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.70/6.56 Prover 1: gave up
% 22.70/6.57 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 22.70/6.59 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 23.17/6.69 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 23.50/6.70 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.95/8.28 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 29.95/8.32 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 30.24/8.37 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.43/8.37 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.86/8.47 Prover 3: gave up
% 30.86/8.47 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 30.86/8.49 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 31.28/8.57 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.28/8.57 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 40.15/10.76 Prover 0: stopped
% 40.48/10.96 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 40.83/10.99 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 41.13/11.06 Prover 5: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 41.13/11.06 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 59.53/24.32 Prover 5: stopped
% 59.74/24.52 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 59.74/24.55 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 60.10/24.62 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 60.10/24.63 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 138.76/94.76 Prover 2: stopped
% 138.96/94.97 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 139.11/95.00 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 139.11/95.04 Prover 7: Proving ...
% 192.51/136.29 Prover 4: stopped
% 192.78/136.49 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 192.85/136.52 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 192.85/136.58 Prover 8: Proving ...
% 212.02/154.76 Prover 6: stopped
% 212.25/154.97 Prover 9: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=completeFrugal
% 212.25/154.98 Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 212.40/155.01 Prover 9: Proving ...
% 231.80/169.78 Prover 9: stopped
% 232.02/169.98 Prover 10: Options: -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 232.02/170.01 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 232.16/170.04 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 232.16/170.05 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 232.64/170.15 Prover 10: gave up
% 232.64/170.15 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 232.64/170.16 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 232.64/170.18 Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 232.64/170.18 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 233.03/170.25 Prover 11: gave up
% 233.03/170.25 Prover 12: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 233.03/170.27 Prover 12: Preprocessing ...
% 233.37/170.30 Prover 12: Proving ...
% 236.30/172.41 Prover 12: stopped
% 236.50/172.61 Prover 13: Options: -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 236.50/172.64 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 236.70/172.68 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 236.70/172.68 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 240.73/175.59 Prover 13: proved (2978ms)
% 240.73/175.59 Prover 8: stopped
% 240.73/175.59 Prover 7: stopped
% 240.73/175.59
% 240.73/175.59 No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 240.73/175.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 240.73/175.59
% 240.73/175.59 Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------