TSTP Solution File: SEU424+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU424+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.01s 7.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1734,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))
| ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i700518w/lgb.p',i_0_1734) ).
cnf(i_0_2575,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk370_0,esk367_0,esk368_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i700518w/lgb.p',i_0_2575) ).
cnf(i_0_2577,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk367_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i700518w/lgb.p',i_0_2577) ).
cnf(i_0_2576,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk369_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk367_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i700518w/lgb.p',i_0_2576) ).
cnf(i_0_2574,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(esk367_0,esk368_0,esk369_0,esk370_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk368_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i700518w/lgb.p',i_0_2574) ).
cnf(c_0_2583,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))
| ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
i_0_1734 ).
cnf(c_0_2584,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk370_0,esk367_0,esk368_0),
i_0_2575 ).
cnf(c_0_2585,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk367_0),
i_0_2577 ).
cnf(c_0_2586,negated_conjecture,
( m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(esk367_0,esk368_0,X1,esk370_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk368_0)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(esk367_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2583,c_0_2584]),c_0_2585]) ).
cnf(c_0_2587,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk369_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk367_0)),
i_0_2576 ).
cnf(c_0_2588,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(esk367_0,esk368_0,esk369_0,esk370_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk368_0))),
i_0_2574 ).
cnf(c_0_2589,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2586,c_0_2587]),c_0_2588]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU424+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:23:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 3.03/3.21 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.03/3.21 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 3.03/3.21 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 3.03/3.21 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 13.01/7.04 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.01/7.04 # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.01/7.04 # Trying AutoSched0 for 148 seconds
% 13.01/7.04 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S05EI
% 13.01/7.04 # and selection function SelectDivPreferIntoLits.
% 13.01/7.04 #
% 13.01/7.04 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 13.01/7.04 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.01/7.04
% 13.01/7.04 # Proof found!
% 13.01/7.04 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.01/7.04 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.01/7.04 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.01/7.04
% 13.01/7.04 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.01/7.04 # User time : 0.031 s
% 13.01/7.04 # System time : 0.008 s
% 13.01/7.04 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 13.01/7.04 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 13.01/7.04
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------