TSTP Solution File: SEU424+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU424+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.65s 3.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 16 unt; 4 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 75 ( 3 equ; 40 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2932,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_2932) ).
cnf(i_0_2657,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_2657) ).
cnf(i_0_314,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_314) ).
cnf(i_0_798,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_798) ).
cnf(i_0_3595,plain,
( r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_3595) ).
cnf(i_0_1148,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1148) ).
cnf(i_0_1884,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(esk319_0,esk320_0,esk321_0,esk322_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk320_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1884) ).
cnf(i_0_1836,plain,
( k3_tarski(a_4_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X4,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1836) ).
cnf(i_0_1886,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk321_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk319_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1886) ).
cnf(i_0_1887,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk319_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1887) ).
cnf(i_0_1885,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk322_0,esk319_0,esk320_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1885) ).
cnf(i_0_2658,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_2658) ).
cnf(i_0_634,plain,
( m1_subset_1(k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_634) ).
cnf(i_0_1128,plain,
( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5crehwu8/lgb.p',i_0_1128) ).
cnf(c_0_3610,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_2932 ).
cnf(c_0_3611,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2657 ).
cnf(c_0_3612,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,X1) ),
i_0_314 ).
cnf(c_0_3613,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
i_0_798 ).
cnf(c_0_3614,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3610,c_0_3611]) ).
cnf(c_0_3615,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3612,c_0_3611]),c_0_3613]) ).
cnf(c_0_3616,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X3),X2)
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3614,c_0_3615]) ).
cnf(c_0_3617,plain,
( r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
i_0_3595 ).
cnf(c_0_3618,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3616,c_0_3617]) ).
cnf(c_0_3619,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X1))),
i_0_1148 ).
cnf(c_0_3620,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3618,c_0_3619]) ).
cnf(c_0_3621,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_4_0_relset_2(esk319_0,esk320_0,esk321_0,esk322_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk320_0))),
i_0_1884 ).
cnf(c_0_3622,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)))
| ~ r1_tarski(k3_tarski(X1),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3620,c_0_3617]) ).
cnf(c_0_3623,plain,
( k3_tarski(a_4_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X4,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X4,X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
i_0_1836 ).
cnf(c_0_3624,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk321_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk319_0)),
i_0_1886 ).
cnf(c_0_3625,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk319_0),
i_0_1887 ).
cnf(c_0_3626,negated_conjecture,
~ r1_tarski(k3_tarski(a_4_0_relset_2(esk319_0,esk320_0,esk321_0,esk322_0)),esk320_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3621,c_0_3622]) ).
cnf(c_0_3627,negated_conjecture,
( k3_tarski(a_4_0_relset_2(esk319_0,X1,esk321_0,X2)) = k10_relset_1(esk319_0,X1,X2,esk321_0)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X2,esk319_0,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3623,c_0_3624]),c_0_3625]) ).
cnf(c_0_3628,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(esk322_0,esk319_0,esk320_0),
i_0_1885 ).
cnf(c_0_3629,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_2658 ).
cnf(c_0_3630,plain,
( m1_subset_1(k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_634 ).
cnf(c_0_3631,negated_conjecture,
~ r1_tarski(k10_relset_1(esk319_0,esk320_0,esk322_0,esk321_0),esk320_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3626,c_0_3627]),c_0_3628])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3632,plain,
( r1_tarski(k10_relset_1(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
| ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3629,c_0_3630]) ).
cnf(c_0_3633,plain,
~ m1_relset_1(esk322_0,esk319_0,esk320_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3631,c_0_3632]) ).
cnf(c_0_3634,plain,
( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_1128 ).
cnf(c_0_3635,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3633,c_0_3634]),c_0_3628])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SEU424+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:38:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.65/3.69 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.65/3.69 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.65/3.69 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.65/3.69 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.65/3.69 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.65/3.69 #
% 9.65/3.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 9.65/3.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.65/3.69
% 9.65/3.69 # Proof found!
% 9.65/3.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.65/3.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.65/3.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.65/3.69
% 9.65/3.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.65/3.69 # User time : 0.101 s
% 9.65/3.69 # System time : 0.007 s
% 9.65/3.69 # Total time : 0.108 s
% 9.65/3.69 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 9.65/3.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------