TSTP Solution File: SEU422+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU422+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.79s 70.96s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 72 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 26 ~; 20 |; 4 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 3 sgn 32 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t16_relset_2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t16_relset_2) ).
fof(t15_relset_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> X2 = k3_tarski(a_2_0_relset_2(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t15_relset_2) ).
fof(t100_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1] : r1_tarski(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+6.ax',t100_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(t3_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
<=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t3_subset) ).
fof(t79_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
=> r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+6.ax',t79_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(t2_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
=> ( v1_xboole_0(X2)
| r2_hidden(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t2_subset) ).
fof(fc1_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',fc1_subset_1) ).
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
=> m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t4_subset) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t16_relset_2]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( v1_xboole_0(X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
| X4 = k3_tarski(a_2_0_relset_2(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t15_relset_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(esk1222_0)
& m1_subset_1(esk1223_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0))
& ~ m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2] : r1_tarski(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X2))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t100_zfmisc_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = k3_tarski(a_2_0_relset_2(X2,X1))
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk1223_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk1222_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| r1_tarski(X3,X4) )
& ( ~ r1_tarski(X3,X4)
| m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k3_tarski(X1))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
k3_tarski(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0)) = esk1223_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ r1_tarski(X3,X4)
| r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t79_zfmisc_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,X4)
| v1_xboole_0(X4)
| r2_hidden(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X2] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_subset_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(esk1223_0,esk1222_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X4,X5)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X6))
| m1_subset_1(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1223_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_2_0_relset_2(esk1222_0,esk1223_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1222_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SEU422+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:35:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.56/23.62 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/23.62 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/23.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.60/31.32 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.67/46.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.67/46.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.67/46.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.72/54.34 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/69.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/69.66 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/69.66 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/70.96 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/70.96 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.79/70.96 # Preprocessing time : 0.151 s
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.79/70.96 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.79/70.96 # Parsed axioms : 4487
% 0.79/70.96 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4349
% 0.79/70.96 # Initial clauses : 237
% 0.79/70.96 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.79/70.96 # Initial clauses in saturation : 226
% 0.79/70.96 # Processed clauses : 1900
% 0.79/70.96 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.79/70.96 # ...subsumed : 525
% 0.79/70.96 # ...remaining for further processing : 1351
% 0.79/70.96 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.79/70.96 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 23338
% 0.79/70.96 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.79/70.96 # Backward-rewritten : 17
% 0.79/70.96 # Generated clauses : 25775
% 0.79/70.96 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 25309
% 0.79/70.96 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 42
% 0.79/70.96 # Paramodulations : 25695
% 0.79/70.96 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.79/70.96 # Equation resolutions : 66
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of processed clauses : 1318
% 0.79/70.96 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 395
% 0.79/70.96 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Negative unit clauses : 120
% 0.79/70.96 # Non-unit-clauses : 803
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.79/70.96 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of archived clauses : 31
% 0.79/70.96 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51070
% 0.79/70.96 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31590
% 0.79/70.96 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 136
% 0.79/70.96 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8739
% 0.79/70.96 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5745
% 0.79/70.96 # BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.79/70.96 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Termbank termtop insertions : 78300877
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/70.96 # User time : 7.558 s
% 0.79/70.96 # System time : 0.113 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Total time : 7.671 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Maximum resident set size: 225716 pages
% 0.79/70.96 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.79/70.96 # OLD status Res
% 0.79/70.96 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.79/70.96 # Preprocessing time : 0.088 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.79/70.96 # OLD status Res
% 0.79/70.96 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 0.79/70.96 # Preprocessing time : 0.176 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_33aa8a325940064c53b389b41203bb48a5cb5006 for 23 seconds:
% 0.79/70.96 # Preprocessing time : 1.036 s
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof found!
% 0.79/70.96 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.79/70.96 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object total steps : 38
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object clause steps : 21
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object conjectures : 16
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object clause conjectures : 13
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object generating inferences : 10
% 0.79/70.96 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.79/70.96 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.79/70.96 # Parsed axioms : 4487
% 0.79/70.96 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Initial clauses : 10550
% 0.79/70.96 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1001
% 0.79/70.96 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9549
% 0.79/70.96 # Processed clauses : 11093
% 0.79/70.96 # ...of these trivial : 183
% 0.79/70.96 # ...subsumed : 866
% 0.79/70.96 # ...remaining for further processing : 10044
% 0.79/70.96 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3082
% 0.79/70.96 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 384730
% 0.79/70.96 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.79/70.96 # Backward-rewritten : 35
% 0.79/70.96 # Generated clauses : 497667
% 0.79/70.96 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 484670
% 0.79/70.96 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Paramodulations : 493137
% 0.79/70.96 # Factorizations : 48
% 0.79/70.96 # Equation resolutions : 4484
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of processed clauses : 9937
% 0.79/70.96 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1216
% 0.79/70.96 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.79/70.96 # Negative unit clauses : 372
% 0.79/70.96 # Non-unit-clauses : 8342
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96574
% 0.79/70.96 # ...number of literals in the above : 348142
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Current number of archived clauses : 69
% 0.79/70.96 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5627340
% 0.79/70.96 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 765604
% 0.79/70.96 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 364
% 0.79/70.96 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1318826
% 0.79/70.96 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4089
% 0.79/70.96 # BW rewrite match successes : 69
% 0.79/70.96 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.79/70.96 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14514906
% 0.79/70.96
% 0.79/70.96 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.79/70.96 # User time : 15.430 s
% 0.79/70.96 # System time : 0.172 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Total time : 15.602 s
% 0.79/70.96 # Maximum resident set size: 168328 pages
% 0.79/92.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/92.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/92.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.72 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.79/92.73 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------