TSTP Solution File: SEU422+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SEU422+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:58:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.70s 1.87s
% Output : Refutation 3.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 36
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 64 ( 9 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 139 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 361 ( 27 ~; 2 |; 41 &; 249 @)
% ( 5 <=>; 37 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 13 ( 13 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 10 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 97 ( 0 ^; 82 !; 15 ?; 97 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v1_xboole_0_type,type,
v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).
thf(m1_subset_1_type,type,
m1_subset_1: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_zfmisc_1_type,type,
k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).
thf(a_2_0_relset_2_type,type,
a_2_0_relset_2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(v1_relat_1_type,type,
v1_relat_1: $i > $o ).
thf(v3_relat_1_type,type,
v3_relat_1: $i > $o ).
thf(r1_tarski_type,type,
r1_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_tarski_type,type,
k1_tarski: $i > $i ).
thf(r2_hidden_type,type,
r2_hidden: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(k1_xboole_0_type,type,
k1_xboole_0: $i ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) ) )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ C ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_subset) ).
thf(69,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) ) )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ C ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( r1_tarski @ A @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( r1_tarski @ A @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_relat_1) ).
thf(78,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(84,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ A @ B ) @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_relset_2) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ A @ B ) @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(28,plain,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ A @ B ) @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_relat_1) ).
thf(105,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( v1_relat_1 @ A )
& ( v3_relat_1 @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_relat_1) ).
thf(32,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( v1_relat_1 @ A )
& ( v3_relat_1 @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) )
<=> ( r1_tarski @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).
thf(108,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) )
=> ( r1_tarski @ A @ B ) )
& ( ( r1_tarski @ A @ B )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r1_tarski @ ( k1_tarski @ A ) @ B )
<=> ( r2_hidden @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( r1_tarski @ ( k1_tarski @ A ) @ B )
=> ( r2_hidden @ A @ B ) )
& ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
=> ( r1_tarski @ ( k1_tarski @ A ) @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ C @ A )
<=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ A )
=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) )
& ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(27,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
& ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_subset_1) ).
thf(119,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ? [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
& ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ B )
=> ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ B )
| ( r2_hidden @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ B )
=> ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ B )
| ( r2_hidden @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_subset_1) ).
thf(89,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(116,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v3_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc12_relat_1) ).
thf(74,plain,
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v3_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_subset_1) ).
thf(92,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ C @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) ) )
=> ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ B @ C ) )
<=> ? [D: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ D @ B )
& ( A
= ( k1_tarski @ D ) )
& ( r2_hidden @ D @ C ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fraenkel_a_2_0_relset_2) ).
thf(97,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ C @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) ) )
=> ( ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ B @ C ) )
=> ? [D: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ D @ B )
& ( A
= ( k1_tarski @ D ) )
& ( r2_hidden @ D @ C ) ) )
& ( ? [D: $i] :
( ( m1_subset_1 @ D @ B )
& ( A
= ( k1_tarski @ D ) )
& ( r2_hidden @ D @ C ) )
=> ( r2_hidden @ A @ ( a_2_0_relset_2 @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ C ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_subset) ).
thf(71,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
& ( m1_subset_1 @ B @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ C ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r1_tarski @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ C @ A )
=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( r1_tarski @ A @ B )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ C @ A )
=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) ) )
& ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ C @ A )
=> ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) )
=> ( r1_tarski @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(86,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_relat_1) ).
thf(113,plain,
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 )
& ( v1_relat_1 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_tarski @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_subset_1) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ ( k1_tarski @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( v1_xboole_0 @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relat_1) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
=> ( v1_relat_1 @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( r2_hidden @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( r2_hidden @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
=> ( m1_subset_1 @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(122,plain,
$false,
inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[69,52,78,84,28,105,32,108,35,40,119,61,89,116,74,92,97,71,54,86,113,81,63,95,50,67]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU422+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:21:58 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.82/0.85 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.17/0.98 % [INFO] Parsing done (126ms).
% 1.17/0.99 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.73/1.20 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.73/1.20 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.73/1.20 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.89/1.26 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 29 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.89/1.30 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 25 axioms (removed 4 axioms).
% 2.22/1.34 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.22/1.34 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.22/1.34 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.70/1.87 % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 3.70/1.87 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.70/1.87 % Time passed: 1338ms (effective reasoning time: 876ms)
% 3.70/1.87 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.70/1.87 % Axioms used in derivation (25): cc1_relat_1, t5_subset, fc2_subset_1, t2_tarski, t4_subset, rc1_subset_1, fraenkel_a_2_0_relset_2, rc2_relat_1, t8_boole, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc4_relat_1, t1_subset, rc3_relat_1, t6_boole, rc2_subset_1, t7_boole, fc1_subset_1, t3_subset, existence_m1_subset_1, d3_tarski, rc1_relat_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t2_subset, t37_zfmisc_1, fc12_relat_1
% 3.70/1.87 % No. of inferences in proof: 54
% 3.70/1.87 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1338 ms resp. 876 ms w/o parsing
% 3.88/1.92 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.88/1.92 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------