TSTP Solution File: SEU420+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : SEU420+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:03:31 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 205.51s 202.63s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU420+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:09:24 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 17.04/16.68 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 17.04/16.68 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 17.04/16.68 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.47/33.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.47/33.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.47/33.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 51.81/51.28 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 51.81/51.28 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 51.81/51.28 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 76.11/75.47 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.11/75.47 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.11/75.47 Peak sizes were: global stack 129560 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 93.46/92.59 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 93.46/92.59 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 93.46/92.59 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 111.18/110.67 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 111.18/110.67 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 111.18/110.67 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 145.36/144.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 145.36/144.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 145.36/144.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 129560 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 205.47/202.14 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 205.47/202.14 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 205.47/202.14 Peak sizes were: global stack 129432 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 205.51/202.63 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------