TSTP Solution File: SEU420+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU420+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:42:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 16.90s 3.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (   9 unt;   4 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  152 (  33 equ; 105 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  153 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k3_xboole_0(X4,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4),k1_tarski(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))),X1)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    k2_tarski(X1,X2) = k2_tarski(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X5,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X5,X1),k1_tarski(X5)),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k3_xboole_0(X2,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_20,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k3_xboole_0(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_20) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dlngznil/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k3_xboole_0(X4,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4),k1_tarski(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))),X1)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    k2_tarski(X1,X2) = k2_tarski(X2,X1),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X5,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X5,X1),k1_tarski(X5)),X3) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k3_xboole_0(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1)),k1_tarski(esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1))),X2)
    | X4 != k9_relat_1(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k3_xboole_0(X2,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X5),k1_tarski(X5)),X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X5,X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4,X5,X1)),k1_tarski(esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4,X5,X1))),X3)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X5)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X5,X7)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6,X3,X1),X7)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k2_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4,X5,X1)),k1_tarski(esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4,X5,X1))),X2)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X5)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k3_xboole_0(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X5,X6)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X4,X7)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk4_4(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6,X3,X1),X7)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X5,X3),X4))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X5,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5),X6)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X4,X6)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk7_2(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk7_2(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),X4),X5)
    | r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),X4)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X2,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X2 != k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X3,X5),X4))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X3,X5))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(esk7_2(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),k3_xboole_0(X4,X5)),X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(esk7_2(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),X4),X5)
    | r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),X4)
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),k3_xboole_0(X4,X5))
    | X5 != k9_relat_1(X2,X3)
    | X4 != k9_relat_1(X1,X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_79]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk2_0),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU420+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:04:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 16.90/3.52  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15+lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15+coop-mzr02:
% 16.90/3.52  # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15/lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 39; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 16.90/3.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.910 s
% 16.90/3.52  
% 16.90/3.52  # Proof found!
% 16.90/3.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 16.90/3.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 16.90/3.52  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 16.90/3.52  
% 16.90/3.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 16.90/3.52  # User time                : 0.911 s
% 16.90/3.52  # System time              : 0.120 s
% 16.90/3.52  # Total time               : 1.031 s
% 16.90/3.52  # ...preprocessing         : 0.910 s
% 16.90/3.52  # ...main loop             : 0.121 s
% 16.90/3.52  # Maximum resident set size: 168088 pages
% 16.90/3.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------